Skip to content
JevDirectory.org
Patterns

Confidence-gated routing

Use the answer to decide what to do and confidence to decide whether to act, with per-action thresholds set by the cost of being wrong.

Open docs.typesafe.aiAll 117 terms
Category
Patterns
Also known as
—
Related terms
5
Directory entries
36
Docs
docs.typesafe.ai
Added
2026-09-24

Definition

The voice-banking example routes any intent below 0.6 confidence to a support agent before the action is considered. Above that, check_balance is safe at 0.6 because the worst case is a wrong read-out, while approve_transfer needs more than 0.85 or the user confirms first.

Confidence is not permission: a high-confidence answer can still be wrong, so irreversible actions keep hard limits in code next to the model.

Tagspatternsconfidencerouting

Related terms

Definitions that connect to this one.

Confidence gateA threshold on confidence that decides whether code acts, confirms first, or escalates to a person or a bigger model.Answers & ConfidenceThresholdThe value your code compares against a score, a Noul probability, or a confidence to turn an answer into an action.Answers & ConfidenceIntent routingClassify intent with a Choice and complexity with a Score, then send each branch to deterministic code, a specialist model, or a person.PatternsConfidence floorA baseline below which code never acts on an answer, regardless of what the answer says.Answers & ConfidenceHuman reviewThe explicit path for uncertain or high-stakes cases: route to a person instead of acting on a low-confidence answer.Patterns

From the directory

Pattern: Confidence-Gated Routing
Use the answer to decide what to do and confidence to decide whether to act: the voice-banking example routes below 0.6 to a human and needs 0.85 or more to auto-approve a transfer.
Practices & PatternsDocs#official#patterns#confidence
Official
Confidence
How TypeSafe reports certainty, how it differs from probability, and how to use it architecturally to gate and route decisions.
Practices & PatternsDocs#official#confidence#routing
Official
Companion
A 3D robot that understands without generating text: one TypeSafe call per turn with nine typed questions, then code decides whether to act, ask, or shrug.
Cookbooks & DemosPlayground#community#playground#embodied-agent
Community
jevcal
11GitHub stars
CLI that fits a per-question confidence threshold to a target accuracy on your own labeled data, verifies it on a held-out split, estimates how much traffic still needs an LLM, and re-checks locked thresholds in CI. It publishes no Jev results of its own.
Practices & Patterns#community#python#calibration
Communityabhixhek/jevcalPython
typesafe-sdk (Ruby client)
8GitHub stars
A Ruby client for TypeSafe's System One API that returns typed Noul, Choice, and Score answers, validates obvious input mistakes before spending a request, and pools HTTP connections across threads.
Repos & SDKs#community#ruby#sdk
Communityjoshmn/typesafe-sdkRuby
Does Jev know when it doesn't know?
7GitHub stars
An independent calibration study of Jev over three public benchmarks and 900 rule-generated support tickets, publishing every raw Gateway response and the quantization limits of returned probabilities.
Practices & Patterns#community#python#calibration
Communityscienthoon/jev-ood-calibrationPython

30 more matching entries in the full directory.

From the community

Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.

Follow @typesafeai

Inferring Jev's internals from 1,000 calls

iwashi / Yoshimasa Iwase
iwashi / Yoshimasa Iwase
@iwashi86
·

Jevの内部アーキテクチャを推測している技術記事(Jev’s Architecture Unmasked)からメモ。 ・本記事はJevのAPIを約1万回の呼び出して、内部構造を推測したもの ・従来の言語モデルを用いた分類やルーティングでは、トークンを1文字ずつ逐次生成するために膨大な無駄な計算コストが発生していた。 Show more

Reply
Read 2 replies

The open System One roundup

小墨同学
小墨同学
@xiaomovps
·

Jev 发布没几天，开源社区已经开始疯狂复刻了🔥 最值得推荐的五个模型： 1、Laya 421M：原生决策模型，支持 Mac 2、Decider-2B：最像 Jev，基于 Qwen3.5 3、NanoJev 0.6B：专门的 Decision Head 4、Reflex：Qwen3.5 + Direct Logits 5、System-One 4B：专门做概率校准 Show more

小墨同学
小墨同学
@xiaomovps

Jev 刚发布没几天，开源社区就出现了同款🔥 Decider-2B模型，是基于 Qwen3.5-2B 做了特殊调整 它和 Jev 模型是一样的 只做选择 评分和判断 不是文本类的 LLM 模型 但两者还是有几个明显区别： 1、模型 Jev：闭源 System One Model Decider：Qwen3.5-2B，约 1.9B 参数，Apache 2.0 开源 2、价格

Image
Reply
Read 6 replies

Jev lands on the Vercel AI Gateway

Vercel ships the AI SDK provider for Jev

Computer use at 155× cheaper than Opus 5

aaron
aaron
vellum
@awlevin
·

i built computer use using @typesafeai ! it is 155x cheaper than opus 5, ~20x faster, and generalizes across OS's more on how it works in the vid & thread below:

Watch on X
Diogo Almeida
Diogo Almeida
TypeSafe AI
@CompleteSkeptic

After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI? I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev • 20-200x faster • 40-400x

Watch on X
Reply
Read 69 replies

Foreman keeps coding agents on task