Full Jev Tutorial What it is, how you can build with it and what new applications it can unlock → 0:00 Intro → 0:34 Jev explained → 4:06 API setup → 5:59 Demo 1: Voice-controlled browser → 11:33 Demo 2: AI memory → 17:27 Demo 3: YouTube predictor
Pattern: Confidence-Gated Routing
Use the answer to decide what to do and confidence to decide whether to act: the voice-banking example routes below 0.6 to a human and needs 0.85 or more to auto-approve a transfer.
- Category
- Practices & Patterns
- Published by
- TypeSafe AI
- Author
- —
- Added
- 2026-09-20
Highlights
- Any intent below 0.6 confidence routes to a support agent before the action is considered.
- check_balance is safe at 0.6 because the worst case is a wrong read-out.
- approve_transfer needs more than 0.85, otherwise the user confirms first.
- Thresholds are set per action by the consequences of a wrong classification.
Quickstart
if action.confidence < 0.6:
route_to_support_agent(account_id)
elif action.choice == "check_balance":
show_balance(account_id)
elif action.choice == "approve_transfer":
if action.confidence > 0.85:
approve_transfer(account_id)
else:
ask_user_to_confirm("Just to confirm: you would like to approve this transfer?")Watch out
Confidence is not permission: a high-confidence answer can still be wrong, so keep hard limits next to the model for irreversible actions.
More like this
From the community
Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.
Full Jev video tutorial
The case against Jev-scored compaction
This is a terrible compaction strategy that fundamentally doesn't understand how compaction and context management work. Seems like a lot of people are confused so let's break this down. 1. Compaction isn't a filter The role of compaction is to clean up history to keep the Show more
found the perfect use case for @typesafeai Jev: instant compaction in 2026, why is compaction still a summarization prompt? Jev can make it instant by scoring every tool call and dropping what’s irrelevant