Multimodal finite-choice decision interface and MuJoCo robotic-arm workbench: dual-camera images and state go to a self-hosted Qwen3.5-9B with a corrective head, which returns one typed next-skill choice without generating text.
OmniJev is a multimodal research project for robot decision-making, providing a finite-choice decision SDK, an HTTP service, and a MuJoCo robotic arm workbench.
Current model is Qwen3.5-9B plus a v4 corrective head; weights are the LoRA and residual head at tzcfly/OmniJev-Qwen3.5-9B-v4, around 26.1 GB
On 923 held-out image questions across three official interfaces it scores 76.5% total versus 72.3% and 68.7% for two 4B baselines
Released episodes finish transfer, stack and barrier tasks in 13 decisions and 39 output tokens each
208 of 208 non-audio probe requests were valid; unobservable inputs return insufficient evidence instead of a guess
Four public benchmark pilots report paired accuracy with direct short answer while cutting decision latency 6.8-13.6x and total tokens 51-86%
Watch out
MIT license. Preview quality: skill-mode results use privileged simulator state and are not end-to-end visual planning; audio is wired in the client but rejected by the current backend.
Questions about this entry
Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.
Requirements list Python 3.9+ for the SDK and HTTP service, Python 3.12+ for the workbench, and a validated NVIDIA A800 80GB with about 25 GB of GPU memory for the model service.
One scored choice among the options supplied with the request, plus the option probabilities. One forward pass scores candidates and no answer token is generated.
No. One forward pass scores the options supplied with the request and returns their probabilities; the technical report says no answer token is generated. The probability bars are softmax over option-letter logprobs, not calibrated confidence.
It abstains rather than guessing. In the twelve probe families, the four cases with no image, an unobservable property, a blank frame or a color outside the candidate set all return insufficient evidence, which the finite-choice interface is built to make explicit.
On 923 held-out image questions across three official interfaces it scores 76.5% total against 72.3% for NeoHorse-Jev-4B and 68.7% for tinnel OmniJev-4B. The report notes this is a 9B model against two 4B models on one fixed suite.
Place Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B at models/Qwen3.5-9B and the v4 lora.pt, head.pt and config.json at models/runs/qwen35-rlcd-v4. The 9B backbone is not redistributed in the repository, and the model files total about 26.1GB.
No. The released replays use skill mode with privileged simulator state, where the model chooses among preset skills and a program executes the IK trajectory. Dual-camera vision input is a separate mode with separately reported results.
Reactions & coverage
Posts, threads, and videos about this entry from around the web.
Hacker News: Pick Verify: a single decision at the warehouse pick station catches confusable picks.
The vision sibling: the same text-trained System 1 head on Qwen3.8-27B's image encoder, taking images zero-shot, ranked first of 20 vision decision models on the community Jev Decision Index 0.3.
Serves Shanghai AI Lab's Intern-Decision-0.8B vision decision model on Apple Silicon behind a /v1/systemone-shaped endpoint: screenshots plus typed questions in, calibrated Choice, Score and Noul probabilities out, for thresholding and escalation.
MuJoCo simulation where a local decider-2b model picks the next skill for an AgileX PiPER arm through a Jev-style typed-choice interface while the red cube target is pushed to new positions mid-run. Deterministic checks may reject a chosen skill but never substitute another.
An Apache-2.0 decision engine with a TypeSafe-compatible endpoint, document answers with source passages, and a ViZDoom demo that picks actions from structured game state.
Jev takes text only; Clef-omni adds image, audio, and video input and Liquid d1 adds images, each keeping the same typed-answer shape. Where that matters, where it does not, and the costs the vendors underplay.
One model in September, a dozen by October. Clef, Liquid d1, Perplexity, and OpenAI all ship the same typed-answer shape now. How to read the rival benchmarks and pick on your own task.
Hundreds of repositories carry the system-one tag, but the ecosystem is a dozen ideas in different sizes. A tour of the families, the licenses, and what a download does not include.