Skip to content

What Is Actually on Hugging Face

Hundreds of repositories carry the system-one tag, but the ecosystem is a dozen ideas in different sizes. A tour of the families, the licenses, and what a download does not include.

Published
Category
Jev Models & Reimplementations
Resources cited
12
Reading time
3 min
Tags#open-models#hugging-face#local#evaluation

Search the Hub for system-one and you get 799 model repositories. That number is misleading in both directions: most are variants of a dozen ideas, and the interesting ones are not the biggest. Here is what is actually on Hugging Face, and what a download buys you compared with the hosted API.

What the Hub actually has

The families are easy to separate once you look. Laya carries three checkpoints in one repository: a 421M English encoder, a 322M multilingual build, and a fine-tuned typed-decisions model. Julia 1 is a 144.3M encoder with a WebGPU export next door. AutoTrust's JEV-27B, JEV-27B-VL, JEV-9B, and GEV-26B-Decide are distilled students on frozen Qwen and Gemma backbones. Liquid AI's d1-3B and Mapika's decider readout round out the mid-size tier.

Beside the models sit 21 datasets with typed-decisions in the name, from the 2,000-decision benchmark to 2.5 million recast decisions, plus two operating leaderboards: the Typed Decision Leaderboard and the S1MB mosaic board.

Three shapes of open decision model

The first shape is encoder-first: a bidirectional backbone does the language work and a decision head reads options from its hidden states. Laya, Julia 1, and OpenDecider Nano all fit this pattern, and they are the cheapest to run because they answer in one forward pass with no generated tokens.

The second shape is an adapted LLM. AutoTrust's students keep the backbone frozen and train only a rank-16 LoRA plus a 24-slot head — 108.9M of 27B parameters — so System 2 chat still works through the ordinary weights. Mapika goes further: its Gemma-4-31B entry contains no training at all, just a config that reads option letters at the answer slot.

The third shape is a port. Jev-Style v3 ships GGUF builds down to 0.53 GB, and Julia 1's ONNX export runs in a browser through WebGPU. Ports are where most deployment experiments start.

What the model card tells you

Licenses are the first filter. Most of the ecosystem is Apache-2.0, but Drex weights are CC BY-NC, bev-decider is CC BY-NC because of its training data, d1-3B is under Liquid's own lfm1.0 terms, and Security-One is gated behind conditions.

Provenance is the second. Laya's fine-tuned checkpoint scores 0.766 on typed decisions, above Jev's published 0.727 — but the card says the Jev figure is third-party published, not a run made there. AutoTrust's KL and accuracy numbers are self-reported, with one independent human-labelled rerun cited alongside. Julia's 73.15% edges a supplied reference table. None of this makes the numbers wrong; it makes them readable.

What open does not include

There are no official Jev weights to download, and no card ships its training pipeline: AutoTrust publishes weights, adapter, and reports; Julia publishes the checkpoint and inference code. Calibration is your job on most of these — Laya arrives over-confident and expects you to refit temperatures, and AutoTrust tells you to apply head bias and temperature client-side.

That is the honest trade. A download gives you a checkpoint, a license, and a runnable interface. Turning it into a dependable threshold is the next article: fine-tuning and calibration. For what people have already built on top of these weights, see Open reimplementations.

From the Jev directory

The resources behind this article.

The Hugging Face hub for Laya's open System 1 checkpoints: the 421M English model at the repo root, a 322M multilingual build in a subfolder, and the typed-decisions fine-tune, all Apache-2.0.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#community#open-models#local
Community
Supersonic Labs' 144.3M-parameter decision model on mmBERT-small: choice, score, and noul answers from supplied options in one pass, 73.15% on 2,000 typed decisions, Apache-2.0.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#community#open-models#local
Community
An open distillation of Jev 1.13 onto Qwen3.8-27B: a 108.9M-parameter decision block answers typed questions in one prefill pass and adds a POST /v1/decide route beside a full System 2.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#community#open-models#local
Community
The vision sibling: the same text-trained System 1 head on Qwen3.8-27B's image encoder, taking images zero-shot, ranked first of 20 vision decision models on the community Jev Decision Index 0.3.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#community#open-models#local
Community
The 9B member of AutoTrust's Jev students: a 40.2M-parameter decision block on Qwen3.5-9B with 0.019 mean KL to Jev 1.13 and 70.7% HumanEval left untouched, small enough for one modest GPU.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#community#open-models#local
Community
The 741,000-row distillation corpus behind AutoTrust's Jev students: choice, score, and noul rows with full target distributions across yuri and openjev source streams, Apache-2.0.
Jev Benchmarks & EvaluationsDocs#community#evaluation#distillation
Community
The 400-case, 2,000-decision benchmark open models train and report against: four workflows, state plus typed questions, and gold distributions averaged from three teacher samples.
Jev Benchmarks & EvaluationsDocs#community#benchmarks#evaluation
Community
2.5 million typed decisions recast from 670 sources: choice, score, and noul rows with per-row licenses, soft annotator targets, and Jev-audited mix weights.
Jev Benchmarks & EvaluationsDocs#community#evaluation#calibration
Community
An independent 2,018-item answer-verifier benchmark: the same items and labels for every entrant, each run on its own maker's code, with Jev, ZTC-Judge, Darwin, and open models ranked by weighted AUC.
Jev Benchmarks & EvaluationsPlayground#community#evaluation#benchmarks
Community
The System One Mosaic Benchmark leaderboard: about 100 decision models compared across 100+ specialized tasks, with results regenerated from a public dataset rather than estimated.
Jev Benchmarks & EvaluationsPlayground#community#evaluation#benchmarks
Community
The official Laya playground: eight tabs that show choice, score, and noul decisions on ticket triage, phishing, guardrails, RAG filtering, moderation, routing, and multilingual text.
Jev Demos & ExperimentsPlayground#community#open-models#playground
Community
A ZeroGPU demo of Julia 1: define a state and any set of choice, score, and noul questions and see per-option probabilities rendered as bars and raw JSON.
Jev Demos & ExperimentsPlayground#community#open-models#playground
Community
Back to all articles

More Jev articles

Most Jev accuracy problems are state problems. What belongs in a state, what is a pre-made judgment to leave out, and why naming the slice you ask about matters more than the wording.
Jev Practices & Patterns#state#design#primitives
Read article
A Noul returns one number and no separate confidence. How to read the value, pin its boundary with criteria, split compound questions, and set a per-action threshold that matches the cost of being wrong.
Jev Practices & Patterns#noul#primitives#confidence
Read article

From the Jev community

Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.

Follow @typesafeai