Skip to content
JevDirectory.org
CommunityTools & Integrations142 starsVerified 2026-09-22

jev-chat-jarvis (macOS)

A macOS floating panel that reads visible WeChat messages through OCR, has a local decider model or TypeSafe Jev classify intent and risk from 0 to 9, then generates and reranks reply candidates without injecting anything into WeChat.

Category
Tools & Integrations
Published by
Community
Author
jev-chat
Added
2026-09-22
Tagscommunitypythonmacosprivacywechat

Highlights

  • Eight intents are recognized zero-shot at 86.4% on a 22-message Chinese regression set, with a 0-9 risk level and an action suggestion.
  • Ten built-in reply tones generate two candidates each in parallel, then a local model reranks them in place; sending stays manual in WeChat.
  • On an M1 Pro it reports about 1.5 s for intent and 1.5-2 s for candidates; OCR boxes can be toggled with JEV_BOXES=1.
  • The judgment layer can use TypeSafe Jev or a local decider-2b (about 7 GB); generation accepts OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible endpoints.
  • Read-only by design: it grabs the WeChat window in-process for Vision OCR of the chat area, never hooks, injects, decrypts, or sends messages.

Quickstart

bash
mkdir -p ~/.config/jev-jarvis
cat > ~/.config/jev-jarvis/env <<'ENV'
export TYPESAFE_API_KEY="YOUR_API_KEY"
export OPENAI_API_KEY="YOUR_API_KEY"
export OPENAI_BASE_URL="https://api.deepseek.com"
export OPENAI_MODEL="deepseek-chat"
ENV
chmod 600 ~/.config/jev-jarvis/env

Watch out

MIT-licensed, macOS only, and prebuilt releases are not notarized. Needs screen recording and accessibility permissions, plus a judgment or generation key unless you use the local decider and bundled shared key.

More like this

210GitHub stars
A Windows WeChat side panel that reads the visible conversation with local RapidOCR, has Jev judge intent and tension and rank three reply candidates, then fills the chosen one into the input box; sending is always manual.
Tools & Integrations#community#python#windows
17.5kGitHub stars
Browser Use's ultrafast agent: Jev picks an operation and an element from an indexed action space in one request, and a small LLM writes text only when the action is TYPE_TEXT.
Tools & Integrations#community#python#browser
Communityjev-ultrafast
3.1kGitHub stars
An Android overlay that reads visible WeChat, QQ, and X conversations through accessibility, asks Jev for intent, danger, and the best action, then drafts three replies and fills one in without ever sending it.
Tools & Integrations#community#kotlin#android
Back to all resources

From the community

Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.

Follow @typesafeai

The open System One roundup

Jev 发布没几天,开源社区已经开始疯狂复刻了🔥 最值得推荐的五个模型: 1、Laya 421M:原生决策模型,支持 Mac 2、Decider-2B:最像 Jev,基于 Qwen3.5 3、NanoJev 0.6B:专门的 Decision Head 4、Reflex:Qwen3.5 + Direct Logits 5、System-One 4B:专门做概率校准 Show more

小墨同学
小墨同学
@xiaomovps

Jev 刚发布没几天,开源社区就出现了同款🔥 Decider-2B模型,是基于 Qwen3.5-2B 做了特殊调整 它和 Jev 模型是一样的 只做选择 评分和判断 不是文本类的 LLM 模型 但两者还是有几个明显区别: 1、模型 Jev:闭源 System One Model Decider:Qwen3.5-2B,约 1.9B 参数,Apache 2.0 开源 2、价格

Image
Reply

The launch post

Trading bot, one decision per block

Classifying 1,500 real emails

this model is actually insane at email classification i tested it on 1500 of my own emails to see how well it works and I am blown away

Diogo Almeida
Diogo Almeida
TypeSafe AI
@CompleteSkeptic

After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI? I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev • 20-200x faster • 40-400x

Reply

Fast browser use with Stagehand

we built blazing fast computer/browser use with Jev + @Stagehanddev. this task cost $0.001 and executed at near instant speed (in a remote browser btw) the loop: observe the page, send a11y tree as state + actions as questions, Jev decides the next action, then Stagehand Show more

Diogo Almeida
Diogo Almeida
TypeSafe AI
@CompleteSkeptic

After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI? I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev • 20-200x faster • 40-400x

Reply

LLM-as-a-judge, sped up

Jev has spoken. It picked which model is AGI. 20–200x faster. 40–400x cheaper. This could make things like LLM-as-a-judge insanely fast and nearly free. (I tried a bunch of prompts and still didn’t burn through $0.10.)

Image
Diogo Almeida
Diogo Almeida
TypeSafe AI
@CompleteSkeptic

After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI? I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev • 20-200x faster • 40-400x

Reply