CommunityJev Models & Reimplementations
StartLux-Decision: AutoThink Decision Models with Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Deliberative Decisions (arXiv 2610.17309)
StartLux-Decision is a family of decision models from 0.8B to 27B parameters pairing single-pass Instant variants with AutoThink versions that reason only when uncertain. On the public subset of Decision Index 0.3 the 27B AutoThink model reaches 73.4.
- Format
- Article
- Published by
- Community
- Last verified
- Oct 2026
Highlights
- Instant models use bidirectional attention in full-attention layers to improve accuracy while keeping single-pass inference.
- AutoThink invokes explicit reasoning for uncertain decisions and answers confident cases directly.
- RLCD-squared raises traces terminating within the generation limit by up to 48 pp and cuts reasoning length up to 65%.
- Instants beat comparable-scale open-weight decision models by 7.4-16.9 points on Decision Index 0.3's public subset.
- On DecisionPivot, AutoThink beats Instant counterparts by 11.5-18.4 points in pair accuracy.
Watch out
Technical report posted October 12, 2026 (cs.CL, cs.AI), 38 pages, by Xialie Zhuang and co-authors. Comparisons are self-reported against the strongest evaluated comparable-scale open-weight models, and the abstract does not state the license or exact release of the weights.
Questions about this entry
Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.
The family spans 0.8B to 27B parameters, combining efficient single-pass prediction with adaptive, confidence-guided reasoning across two variants, Instant and AutoThink.
Instant models use bidirectional attention in full-attention layers for single-pass inference, while AutoThink models invoke explicit reasoning for uncertain decisions and answer confident cases directly.
A three-stage pipeline establishes shared decision capabilities, specializes the two variants, and equips AutoThink with reasoning through reasoning supervision and reinforcement learning.
Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Deliberative Decisions uses a frozen model and proper scoring rules to reward improvements in decision probability quality, with a soft penalty for overlong reasoning traces.
It raised the share of reasoning traces that terminate within the generation limit by up to 48 percentage points and cut average reasoning length by up to 65%, while largely preserving decision accuracy.
On the public subset of Decision Index 0.3 the 27B AutoThink model reaches 73.4, and the Instant models outperform the strongest evaluated comparable-scale open-weight decision models by 7.4-16.9 points.
It is a programmatically verifiable benchmark of computational decisions built from contrast pairs that differ in a single answer-changing detail; AutoThink beats its Instant counterparts by 11.5-18.4 points in pair accuracy there.
Related terms
Glossary definitions related to this entry.
More Jev resources like this
SanSi turns a pre-trained looped language model into a typed decision model that revises its hidden state across loops without generating tokens. On 10,027 test decisions from 59 sources it reaches 72.0% accuracy, 13.5 points above a same-shaped non-looped model trained with the same recipe.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
Introduces Jeva, a decision-native architecture that encodes the request and each option separately and scores options symmetrically. It targets null-awareness, permutation invariance, option scalability, and cacheability, reporting near-perfect null detection and no decision flips under tested permutations.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
Shows that open instruction-tuned models already read decisions from answer-letter logits without training, and that LoRA fine-tuning with a decision head lifts them past Jev: Gemma 4 31B goes from 79.6 to 84.4 on the new 2,352-question OpenDecisions set and scores 81.5 on JevBench v1.7.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
A working RLCD implementation for reasoning models: the model samples a rationale, and a strictly proper scoring rule grades the answer distribution it commits to afterward. With Qwen3-1.7B it matches or beats SFT, RFT/STaR, and GRPO in accuracy and beats all in selective prediction.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
ZimmyGao/openjev-rlcdPython
ZimmyGao/openjev-rlcdPython1.3kGitHub stars
Reads a typed decision from one prefill of a pretrained instruction-tuned model by restricting the next-token distribution to option tokens, then corrects label and position bias with no gradient steps. Averaging over cyclic rotations lowers order-flip rates and raises accuracy on 11 of 11 models.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
nokia-applied-research/AnyJevPython
nokia-applied-research/AnyJevPythonLAVOIR extends the Laya single-pass decision encoder so one forward pass returns both the decision distribution and, for every candidate missing slot, the expected gain from asking the user about it. Its question policy matches a greedy oracle on seen schemas and is 14.1 points more accurate than never asking.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
moganai/lavoirPython
moganai/lavoirPythonFrom the Jev guides
Original write-ups on what this entry is for.
More than eighty preprints now evaluate, attack, and reproduce the typed-decision class. The broadest board, the coherence gap, the rejection bottleneck, and the attacks that still work.
Jev Practices & Patterns#research#evaluation#calibration
Read article
TypeSafe publishes evals, but the numbers that matter are the ones measured on your task. A tour of the independent benchmarks, field reports, and the recurring finding that question design dominates.
Jev Practices & Patterns#benchmarks#evaluation#calibration
Read article
Training recipes, looped architectures, and language ports: what the open side of the typed-decision class shipped this month, and how to pick by runtime and calibration instead of the leaderboard.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#open-models#training#local
Read article
From the Jev community
Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.