Skip to content
Evaluation & TrainingStrictly proper scoring rule

Proper scoring rule

A reward or error measure that is optimized only by reporting true probabilities — the training signal behind RLCD.

Category
Evaluation & Training
Also known as
Strictly proper scoring rule
Related terms
5
Directory entries
66
Docs
—
Added
2026-10-10

Definition

RLCD trains Laya against strictly proper scoring rules: log and spherical scores, plus a ranked probability score for ordinal questions, with REINFORCE updates and a group-mean baseline. Because only honest probabilities maximize expected reward, calibration is the training objective rather than a post-hoc patch.

The same family names the evaluation metrics. Brier score and log loss are proper rules, which is why they appear in both training tables and benchmark reports, and why a model tuned for accuracy alone can top a leaderboard while losing on Brier score and ECE.

Tagscalibrationevaluationtraining

From the Jev directory

The fine-tuned Laya checkpoint for four typed-decision workflows: 0.766 accuracy on 2,000 held-out decisions, above Jev 1.13.0's published 0.727 and the teacher self-agreement ceiling it trained past.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#community#open-models#local
Community
The Hugging Face hub for Laya's open System 1 checkpoints: the 421M English model at the repo root, a 322M multilingual build in a subfolder, and the typed-decisions fine-tune, all Apache-2.0.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#community#open-models#local
Community
An untrained readout: stock Gemma-4-31B weights plus a decider config that reads option letters at the answer slot, scored #2 of 70 on Decision Index v0.2.1 at 57.33 against Jev 1.13.0's 57.91.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#community#open-models#local
Community
The 400-case, 2,000-decision benchmark open models train and report against: four workflows, state plus typed questions, and gold distributions averaged from three teacher samples.
Jev Benchmarks & EvaluationsDocs#community#benchmarks#evaluation
Community
2.5 million typed decisions recast from 670 sources: choice, score, and noul rows with per-row licenses, soft annotator targets, and Jev-audited mix weights.
Jev Benchmarks & EvaluationsDocs#community#evaluation#calibration
Community
572,000 procedurally generated decision problems where labels are computed exactly from rules in the state: 13 task families, 4–60 options, and difficulty calibrated against Jev 1.13.
Jev Benchmarks & EvaluationsDocs#community#evaluation#calibration
Community

60 more matching entries in the full directory.

From the Jev community

Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.

Follow @typesafeai