What kind of model is SanSi and what does it do?

SanSi turns a pre-trained looped language model into a typed decision model: the same layers are recursively applied before one typed readout, and option probabilities are read after every loop without generating a token.

What does the paper mean by System 1.5 thinking?

It describes looping: between a single pass, called System 1 thinking, and generated reasoning, the model recursively applies layers so it can revise its hidden state before committing to an answer.

How accurate is SanSi on the test set?

It reaches 72.0% accuracy on 10,027 test decisions from 59 sources, which is 13.5 points above a non-looped model of the same shape trained with the same recipe.

How does SanSi compare with other model sizes?

SanSi is 5.3 points above a newer non-looped model of its size and 1.8 points below one with three times the parameters, according to the paper's reported comparisons.

Can one SanSi model serve different compute budgets?

Yes. Because option probabilities are read after every loop and every loop is trained with a proper scoring rule, a single model covers every budget from one loop to eight in a single run.

What do loops add on depth-controlled tasks?

Loops extend the solvable depth beyond the depths seen in training on two depth-controlled tasks, where the larger single-pass model fails, according to the abstract.

How was SanSi used as an RL judge?

Used as the judge for policy optimization with reinforcement learning and without gold answers, SanSi raises the share of the generator's correct answers from 37% to 52%.

CommunityJev Models & Reimplementations

SanSi: A Looped Typed Decision Model for System 1.5 Thinking (arXiv 2610.07730)

SanSi turns a pre-trained looped language model into a typed decision model that revises its hidden state across loops without generating tokens. On 10,027 test decisions from 59 sources it reaches 72.0% accuracy, 13.5 points above a same-shaped non-looped model trained with the same recipe.

See highlights

Open arxiv.org

Format: Article
Published by: Community
Last verified: Oct 2026

Tagscommunity research arxiv reasoning calibration decision-models

Works forJev for Classification Jev for Scoring Jev for Evaluation

Used inJev for Software & DevTools Jev for Data & Analytics

Highlights

Reads option probabilities after every loop and trains each loop with a proper scoring rule, serving budgets from one to eight loops.
Reaches 72.0% accuracy on 10,027 test decisions from 59 sources, 13.5 points above a non-looped model of the same shape.
Stands 5.3 points above a newer non-looped model of its size and 1.8 points below one with three times the parameters.
On depth-controlled tasks, loops solve depths beyond those seen in training where the larger single-pass model fails.
As an RL judge without gold answers, SanSi raises the generator's share of correct answers from 37% to 52%.

Watch out

arXiv preprint posted October 6, 2026 (cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG) by Shuyu Gan, Young-Jun Lee, and Dongyeop Kang, updated October 10, 2026. All comparisons are self-reported; the abstract does not name the checked baseline models or state whether SanSi's weights are released.

Questions about this entry

Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.

Related terms

Glossary definitions related to this entry.

More Jev resources like this

StartLux-Decision: AutoThink Decision Models with Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Deliberative Decisions (arXiv 2610.17309)

StartLux-Decision is a family of decision models from 0.8B to 27B parameters pairing single-pass Instant variants with AutoThink versions that reason only when uncertain. On the public subset of Decision Index 0.3 the 27B AutoThink model reaches 73.4.