Organization repository on GitHub
- Forks
- 0
- Last pushed
- Updated Sep 2026
Repo stats from the GitHub API, cached Oct 2026.
CommunityJev Models & Reimplementations
LAVOIR: Teaching a Single-Pass Decision Encoder When and What to Ask with Amortized Value of Information (arXiv 2609.30706)
LAVOIR extends the Laya single-pass decision encoder so one forward pass returns both the decision distribution and, for every candidate missing slot, the expected gain from asking the user about it. Its question policy matches a greedy oracle on seen schemas and is 14.1 points more accurate than never asking.
- Stars
- 0
- Language
- Python
- License
- APACHE-2.0
- Format
- Article
- Published by
- Community
- Last verified
- Oct 2026
- Languages
- Python
Highlights
- VOI targets need no human labels: schema rules supply gold decisions and an LLM only verbalizes text.
- A Gini-impurity cap bounds predicted value by what a calibrated model can still gain.
- On seen schemas, decisions are statistically indistinguishable from the Bayes ceiling.
- Question policy matches a greedy oracle VOI policy on seen schemas: AUC 0.799 vs 0.797.
- On Laya's twelve benchmarks it beats Laya's reported scores on seven and answers in a 31 ms median.
Watch out
arXiv preprint posted September 25, 2026 (cs.AI, cs.CL) by Furkan Yilmaz, Habibe Aleyna Tasdemir, and Muhammed Faruk Gozay; 11 pages, 3 figures, 7 tables. The headline comparisons are against Laya's reported scores rather than reruns, the VOI targets come from schema rules rather than human labels, and the latency median was measured on a single GH200.
Questions about this entry
Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.
It cannot ask for missing information: when a first message does not say what separates two departments, System One models such as TypeSafe's Jev and the open Laya guess. LAVOIR places candidate missing slots next to the answer options so one pass scores them.
Gold decisions come from schema rules, an LLM only verbalizes messages and answers, a model from another family checks every text, and pairing each message with several profiles lets regression on realized gains estimate the expected gain. No human labels are used for VOI targets.
It bounds the predicted value of asking by what a calibrated model can still gain, preventing the encoder from promising gains that are not achievable. On SGD the cap lowers the asking rate from 93% to 8.6%.
On seen schemas the final model's question policy matches a greedy oracle VOI policy, with AUC 0.799 against the oracle's 0.797, and decisions on seen schemas are statistically indistinguishable from the Bayes ceiling.
With at most 0.5 questions per conversation LAVOIR is 14.1 points more accurate than never asking. On real ABCD conversations, one real exchange raises accuracy by 8.3 points where LAVOIR asks, and leaves accuracy unchanged where it does not.
On Laya's twelve benchmarks LAVOIR is above Laya's reported scores on seven. It answers a question in a median of 31 ms on a GH200, which is what makes asking about a slot cheap enough to trigger interactively.
The code is at github.com/moganai/lavoir and the model is at huggingface.co/moganai/lavoir, both named in the paper's comment, alongside 11 pages, 3 figures, and 7 tables of detail.
Reactions & coverage
Posts, threads, and videos about this entry from around the web.
Facebook: Intake Router keeps diagnosis out of the answer space at the front desk.
FacebookClinicnotes
YouTube: Jev explained for routing and judging, with a comparison against LLMs.
Hacker News: Vercel on using Jev for defined decisions and GPT-6 Astra when the job also has to write or use tools.
flashbrew4 pointsTypeSafe AI Jev vs. GPT-6 AstraRead the thread on Hacker NewsHacker News: ASTGL replay chose local Laya routing over hosted Jev on one Mac Studio setup.
Jmeg8r15 pointsDoes an open-weight decision model beat a hosted one? Jev vs. LayaRead the thread on Hacker NewsRelated terms
Glossary definitions related to this entry.
More Jev resources like this
StartLux-Decision is a family of decision models from 0.8B to 27B parameters pairing single-pass Instant variants with AutoThink versions that reason only when uncertain. On the public subset of Decision Index 0.3 the 27B AutoThink model reaches 73.4.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
The v3 Jev-Style decision model at 2B in GGUF: F16 3.78 GB and Q8_0 2.01 GB match PyTorch FP32 on 100% and 99.7% of parity rows, 73.6% on JevBench v1.4.1 public items.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#community#open-models#local
Community
A 70.8M-parameter DeBERTa-v3-xsmall cross-encoder that answers typed decision questions in one batched pass with zero generated tokens, shipped with a calibration.json that the engine requires.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#community#open-models#local
Community
A unified guardrail model that selects an applicable audit policy from a policy tree, then classifies safety conditioned on the retrieved policies. On 7,033 cases it reports 93.72% safety accuracy and 93.10% hierarchical routing accuracy at 58 ms mean latency.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
Introduces Jeva, a decision-native architecture that encodes the request and each option separately and scores options symmetrically. It targets null-awareness, permutation invariance, option scalability, and cacheability, reporting near-perfect null detection and no decision flips under tested permutations.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
1.3kGitHub stars
Reads a typed decision from one prefill of a pretrained instruction-tuned model by restricting the next-token distribution to option tokens, then corrects label and position bias with no gradient steps. Averaging over cyclic rotations lowers order-flip rates and raises accuracy on 11 of 11 models.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
nokia-applied-research/AnyJevPython
nokia-applied-research/AnyJevPythonFrom the Jev guides
Original write-ups on what this entry is for.
Training recipes, looped architectures, and language ports: what the open side of the typed-decision class shipped this month, and how to pick by runtime and calibration instead of the leaderboard.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#open-models#training#local
Read article
More than eighty preprints now evaluate, attack, and reproduce the typed-decision class. The broadest board, the coherence gap, the rejection bottleneck, and the attacks that still work.
Jev Practices & Patterns#research#evaluation#calibration
Read article
TypeSafe publishes evals, but the numbers that matter are the ones measured on your task. A tour of the independent benchmarks, field reports, and the recurring finding that question design dominates.
Jev Practices & Patterns#benchmarks#evaluation#calibration
Read article
From the Jev community
Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.