Jev-Guard: Fast Routing and Auditing Agent Actions over Editable Policy Trees (arXiv 2610.18326)
A unified guardrail model that selects an applicable audit policy from a policy tree, then classifies safety conditioned on the retrieved policies. On 7,033 cases it reports 93.72% safety accuracy and 93.10% hierarchical routing accuracy at 58 ms mean latency.
- Format
- Article
- Published by
- Community
- Last verified
- Oct 2026
Highlights
- Routes each caller's audit context through a policy tree spanning moderation, cybersecurity, privacy, and legal compliance.
- Reports 93.72% safety accuracy and 93.10% hierarchical routing accuracy across 7,033 evaluation cases.
- Mean latency is 58 ms for classification, while the full routing-and-classification pipeline averages 240 ms.
- As a separate permission gate in the Hermes harness, it cut mean review time per task from 4.80s to 1.33s.
- No policy violations were observed for either guard across the agent trajectory tests.
Watch out
arXiv preprint posted October 13, 2026 (cs.CR, cs.CL). All accuracy, latency, and harness numbers are self-reported; the abstract does not say whether weights, code, or the policy tree are released, and the harness comparison covers one integration, so results may not transfer to other policies or frameworks.
Questions about this entry
Reactions & coverage
Posts, threads, and videos about this entry from around the web.
Facebook: Intake Router keeps diagnosis out of the answer space at the front desk.
FacebookClinicnotes
YouTube: Kubernetes admission control with a decision model, fail-closed.
Hacker News: SafeDep Gryph plus Jev checks for compromised coding-agent behavior.
2 pointsDetecting Compromised AI Coding Agents with Jev and GryphRead the thread on Hacker NewsYouTube: Jev explained for routing and judging, with a comparison against LLMs.
More Jev resources like this
From the Jev guides
Original write-ups on what this entry is for.
From the Jev community
Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.