Skip to content

SREGym

SREGym stands up live Kubernetes clusters so SRE agents can be evaluated against 90 fault scenarios, including OS-level faults and metastable and concurrent failures, in containers that cannot see the grading logic.

Stars
338
Language
Python
License
MIT
Published by
Community
Author
SREGym
Last verified
Oct 2026

SREGym/SREGym

Organization repository on GitHub

View on GitHub

Can AI agents resolve production incidents?

Forks
117
Last pushed
Updated Oct 2026

Repo stats from the GitHub API, cached Oct 2026.Homepage

About this project

SREGym: A Benchmarking Platform for SRE Agents. 🔍 Overview SREGym is an AI-native platform to enable the design, development, and evaluation of AI agents for Site Reliability Engineering (SRE). The core idea is to create live system environments for SRE agents to solve real-world SRE problems. SREGym provides a comprehensive SRE benchmark suite with a wide variety of problems for evaluating SRE agents and also for training next-generation AI agents.

Quoted from the project's README. Read the full README.

Highlights

  • 90 problems covering everything from AIOpsLab and ITBench plus OS-level faults, metastable failures, and concurrent failures.
  • SREGym-Lite is 21 representative problems that run on a Kind cluster with 8 vCPU and 16 GB of memory.
  • Agents run in isolated containers built on first run, with network access filtered to the model provider by default.
  • Jev review of diagnostic tests stays off unless you set TYPESAFE_API_KEY and pass --jev-model jev-latest.

Watch out

Setup expects SSH and root access to Linux hosts for OS-level cluster configuration, so a managed Kubernetes service does not work out of the box, and a local kind cluster does not support every problem. Container hardening blocks apt-get unless you disable it, and Jev review is optional and sends evidence to TypeSafe. Copy reviewed against the repository README on 2026-10-04, not from running it.

Questions about this entry

Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.

More Jev resources like this

217GitHub stars
Standardizes hundreds of public datasets into interchangeable multiple-choice, classification, and token-classification templates, and deterministically recasts them into typed choice, score, and noul decision requests.
Jev Benchmarks & Evaluations#community#jevbest
130GitHub stars
Convex's own coding evals, plus a separate multiple-choice decision benchmark in the same repo. Jev is wired into the decision side through OpenRouter's alpha decisions endpoint with a pinned version, while the coding evals still route as chat completions.
Jev Benchmarks & Evaluations#community#jevbest
A calibration write-up and scripts for Jev comment and code rules on a Unity project, with ordering.py to compare rule versions on real blocks.
Jev Benchmarks & Evaluations#community#evaluation#code-review
A 770-post benchmark that scores Jev, Sonnet 5, GPT-5 nano, and two local models on Reddit verdicts with weighted Brier scores.
Jev Benchmarks & Evaluations#community#python#evaluation
0GitHub stars
Independent pre-registered audit of Jev on Spanish: 19,200 calls over 3,200 paired items on XNLI, PAWS-X, MASSIVE and Belebele. A Spanish state costs 3.0-6.4 accuracy points and roughly doubles ECE on the two hardest tasks, while Spanish instructions change nothing; a CLI reruns the same comparison on your own data.
Jev Benchmarks & Evaluations#community#evaluation#calibration
0GitHub stars
Head-to-head benchmark of fast typed classifiers, TypeSafe Jev, OpenAI Decisions and Cloudflare Clef, against Claude models on a frozen, labeled corpus of 2,321 cases across 31 tasks, measuring accuracy, calibration, p95/p99 latency and registry-priced cost.
Jev Benchmarks & Evaluations#community#benchmarking#calibration
Back to all resources

From the Jev community

Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.

Follow @typesafeai