Skip to content

Article

Jev review: tested against Fable on 520 posts

A social-scheduler founder's accuracy test of Jev: four yes/no questions over 522 captions, then the same questions for Fable on a random 100. Agreement reached 94/100 on promotion, and all 520 scored captions cost $0.011.
Format
Article
Reading time
2 min
Published by
Community
Author
seenpaid
Last verified
Oct 2026

Highlights

  • Jev answered four yes/no questions per caption, from spam and bait to whether a stranger would understand the post.
  • 520 of 522 captions returned; 100 were re-asked of Fable with identical wording and no sight of Jev's answers.
  • Agreement table: 94/100 promotion, 76/100 stranger comprehension, 74/100 spam or bait, 70/100 first line.
  • The meta summary adds that Jev was the stricter judge on spam 12 to 3 and agreed 85/100 on it.
  • All 520 captions cost $0.011 at $0.042 per million input tokens with free output, per the author.

Watch out

Grounded in the truncated seenpaid post and its meta description captured on 2026-10-15; the post's later sections did not make it into the digest, and Fable is by the author's own framing a baseline, not ground truth.

Questions about this entry

Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.

From the Jev guides

Original write-ups on what this entry is for.

From the Jev AI model community

Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.

Follow @typesafeai