An ast-grep semantic linter where each rule is one natural-language question judged by Jev: 98 rules flag name/body drift, stale comments, weak tests, quiet failures, and commits whose diffs contradict their messages.
Forty-seven questions ship, most asked in several languages, for 98 rules total, each with a cutoff and a score on its own fixtures.
Six findings over two example files cost a tenth of a cent; costs for larger runs are measured in docs/cost.md rather than extrapolated.
The key is read only from TYPESAFE_API_KEY or TYPESAFEAI_API_KEY in the environment, never from the config file.
jev-lint review judges only lines a diff touched; jev-lint commits judges each message against its diff and the repository's own AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md.
The README says it is not for what compilers, type checkers, or ESLint already decide, and notes it is distinct from huntedman/JevLint.
A Jev-first command-line coding agent: natural-language requests are routed by Jev to one of ten bounded review and triage workflows, and unsupported requests fall back to the Pi coding agent or a workflow Stanley stages for promotion.
A local-first Herdr CLI that filters your agent subscriptions with fixed eligibility rules, then asks TypeSafe Jev to rank the remaining Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, or OpenCode options and pick a reasoning effort.
Agent-ergonomic CLI following the AXI conventions that gives coding agents Jev judgments for blocking risky tool calls, screening fetched content for prompt injection, triaging logs, flagging risky diffs, and ranking many items. Routine commands are decided locally at no cost.
This made me rethink where AI actually fits into security engineering.
For purely engineering work, forget about ChatGPT or Claude.
TypeSafe AI just released Jev, and I think it’s going to change how we build AI into security workflows.
Instead of asking an LLM to “investigateShow more
TypeSafe AI
@typesafeai
we are officially out of stealth! join the frontier and get access to Jev on our website (link on profile)
Jev 发布没几天,开源社区已经开始疯狂复刻了🔥
最值得推荐的五个模型:
1、Laya 421M:原生决策模型,支持 Mac
2、Decider-2B:最像 Jev,基于 Qwen3.5
3、NanoJev 0.6B:专门的 Decision Head
4、Reflex:Qwen3.5 + Direct Logits
5、System-One 4B:专门做概率校准Show more
小墨同学
@xiaomovps
Jev 刚发布没几天,开源社区就出现了同款🔥
Decider-2B模型,是基于 Qwen3.5-2B 做了特殊调整
它和 Jev 模型是一样的 只做选择 评分和判断 不是文本类的 LLM 模型
但两者还是有几个明显区别:
1、模型
Jev:闭源 System One Model
Decider:Qwen3.5-2B,约 1.9B 参数,Apache 2.0 开源
2、价格
After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI?
I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev
• 20-200x faster
• 40-400xShow more
I built a trading bot with Jev!
Jev decides if it should "buy" or "sell", given the price feed of an asset pair, and executes real trades.
It uses Monad to place the orders on Kuru's on-chain order book in every 300ms block.
Demo link → jev-trader.vercel.app