Skip to content

LegalForecastBench

Benchmark harness that tests whether models can forecast federal motion-to-dismiss outcomes from the written record, scored per claim-defendant pair with micro-Brier and clustered intervals.

Stars
7
Language
Python
License
APACHE-2.0
Published by
Community
Author
johnhughes3
Last verified
Oct 2026

About this project

LegalForecast-MTD tests whether frontier models can forecast federal motion-to-dismiss rulings from the judge's written record. It reports claim-defendant micro-Brier scores with clustered intervals. Eligible decisions follow the models' latest first external deployment; known outcome leakage is excluded, and official models run without web access. This reduces a defined leakage path; it does not prove zero contamination or frozen served weights.

Quoted from the project's README. Read the full README.

Highlights

  • Predicts dismissal probability per challenged claim and defendant from the same written record.
  • Controls contamination with cutoff eligibility, redacted inputs, and no-network official runs.
  • Executes official runs as isolated per-model-per-case jobs with bound state and authenticated reruns.
  • Separates official cycles from community fixture comparisons with explicit contributor and adapter docs.

Watch out

Official model rows are withheld while the full report is assembled, and cohort scores are not comparable across releases. Copy reviewed against the repository README on 2026-10-04, not from running it.

Questions about this entry

Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.

More Jev resources like this

24GitHub stars
Unofficial laptop study of parallel constrained decoding: prefill once, share the KV cache across fields, and decide all schema fields in one batched forward pass without writing JSON.
Jev Practices & Patterns#community#jevbest#catalog-import
16GitHub stars
Vendor-neutral harness that tests whether Jev reranking improves a small RAG stack, using frozen hybrid BM25 plus BGE-M3 candidates and isolating retrieval, rerank, and generation stages.
Jev Practices & Patterns#community#jevbest#catalog-import
Frozen 100-question-per-cell check of TypeSafe Jev on Korean versus English reading, paraphrase, and medical exam items, with recorded responses and uncertainty intervals.
Jev Practices & Patterns#community#jevbest#catalog-import
7GitHub stars
Python client and decision toolkit for the Jev System One endpoint with noul, choice, and score primitives, batched asks, composition helpers, concurrent evaluation, and an MCP server.
Jev Practices & Patterns#community#jevbest#catalog-import
7GitHub stars
Two committed benchmarks of Jev: chess, deliberately outside its lane, and NPC addressee detection, squarely inside it, with raw requests and a playground.
Jev Practices & Patterns#community#jevbest#catalog-import
Runs Jev as an LLM router over two public benchmarks, with a no-Jev ablation and RouterArena's own scorer so the numbers sit next to the public leaderboard.
Jev Practices & Patterns#community#jevbest#catalog-import

From the Jev guides

Original write-ups on what this entry is for.

Most Jev accuracy problems are state problems. What belongs in a state, what is a pre-made judgment to leave out, and why naming the slice you ask about matters more than the wording.
Jev Practices & Patterns#state#design#primitives
Read article
A Noul returns one number and no separate confidence. How to read the value, pin its boundary with criteria, split compound questions, and set a per-action threshold that matches the cost of being wrong.
Jev Practices & Patterns#noul#primitives#confidence
Read article
A Score is a weighted position, not a ruler. Why the number can land between levels, why levels are judged separately, and how to combine several atomic scores in code instead of one crowded rubric.
Jev Practices & Patterns#score#primitives#scoring
Read article
Back to all resources

From the Jev community

Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.

Follow @typesafeai