Skip to content

Jev RAG Benchmark

Vendor-neutral harness that tests whether Jev reranking improves a small RAG stack, using frozen hybrid BM25 plus BGE-M3 candidates and isolating retrieval, rerank, and generation stages.

Stars
16
Language
Python
License
MIT
Published by
Community
Author
erendikmenn
Last verified
Oct 2026

About this project

Reproducible, vendor-neutral experiments for measuring whether TypeSafe Jev improves a small RAG system. “Jev wins” is not an assumption: quality, latency, and cost can improve, stay flat, or get worse.

Quoted from the project's README. Read the full README.

Highlights

  • Top-20 hybrid candidate pool raises the gold-passage ceiling before any reranker runs.
  • Batch Noul Jev rerank and Cohere Rerank compared on identical frozen candidates with recall and ranking metrics.
  • Frozen Jev top-five contexts feed both answer models, so generation differences cannot come from retrieval.
  • Ablations for pointwise, ensemble, evidence-router, hierarchical retrieval, and citation verification.

Watch out

Recall and ranking measure passage selection, not answer correctness; high Recall@5 does not mean correct generation. Exact match is harsh on two-sentence answers, the wrong-answer flag is an automatic proxy, and latency is observed route latency. Copy reviewed against the repository README on 2026-10-04, not from running it.

Questions about this entry

Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.

More Jev resources like this

24GitHub stars
Unofficial laptop study of parallel constrained decoding: prefill once, share the KV cache across fields, and decide all schema fields in one batched forward pass without writing JSON.
Jev Practices & Patterns#community#jevbest#catalog-import
39GitHub stars
Reproduction kit that rebuilds a frozen typed-decision benchmark suite from public sources and runs any engine through it with resume, scoring, and index computation.
Jev Practices & Patterns#community#jevbest#catalog-import
7GitHub stars
Benchmark harness that tests whether models can forecast federal motion-to-dismiss outcomes from the written record, scored per claim-defendant pair with micro-Brier and clustered intervals.
Jev Practices & Patterns#community#jevbest#catalog-import
Frozen 100-question-per-cell check of TypeSafe Jev on Korean versus English reading, paraphrase, and medical exam items, with recorded responses and uncertainty intervals.
Jev Practices & Patterns#community#jevbest#catalog-import
7GitHub stars
Python client and decision toolkit for the Jev System One endpoint with noul, choice, and score primitives, batched asks, composition helpers, concurrent evaluation, and an MCP server.
Jev Practices & Patterns#community#jevbest#catalog-import
7GitHub stars
Two committed benchmarks of Jev: chess, deliberately outside its lane, and NPC addressee detection, squarely inside it, with raw requests and a playground.
Jev Practices & Patterns#community#jevbest#catalog-import

From the Jev guides

Original write-ups on what this entry is for.

Most Jev accuracy problems are state problems. What belongs in a state, what is a pre-made judgment to leave out, and why naming the slice you ask about matters more than the wording.
Jev Practices & Patterns#state#design#primitives
Read article
A Noul returns one number and no separate confidence. How to read the value, pin its boundary with criteria, split compound questions, and set a per-action threshold that matches the cost of being wrong.
Jev Practices & Patterns#noul#primitives#confidence
Read article
A Score is a weighted position, not a ruler. Why the number can land between levels, why levels are judged separately, and how to combine several atomic scores in code instead of one crowded rubric.
Jev Practices & Patterns#score#primitives#scoring
Read article
Back to all resources

From the Jev community

Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.

Follow @typesafeai