Skip to content

Sysone Bench

Independent harness grading System One decision models on the same sealed manifest and seed with byte-identical inputs, pitting closed Jev against open Laya and constrained Qwen.

Stars
6
Language
Python
License
MIT
Published by
Community
Author
instax-dutta
Last verified
Oct 2026

About this project

An independent head-to-head benchmark of System One decision models. Laya (open weights), Jev (closed TypeSafe API) and Qwen with parallel constrained decoding (PCD) answer the same 1,190 cases and 1,550 typed questions in one run, from one sealed manifest, at one seed. Inputs are verified byte identical before any number is compared, so the models are graded on the same bytes.

Quoted from the project's README. Read the full README.

Highlights

  • Same cases, question dicts, order, and seed for Laya, Jev, and parallel-constrained Qwen from one sealed manifest.
  • Run artifacts are append-only with pinned identities, checksum verification, and separate raw versus calibrated error.
  • Coverage script derives measured counts from verified run directories instead of hand-kept tallies.
  • Report tooling regenerates comparisons and figures only from validated rows and refuses existing output dirs.

Watch out

Ground truth is one reviewer's correction of an AI draft with no second reviewer or agreement metric, so per-language and edge numbers are judgment calls. Copy reviewed against the repository README on 2026-10-04, not from running it.

Questions about this entry

Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.

More Jev resources like this

24GitHub stars
Unofficial laptop study of parallel constrained decoding: prefill once, share the KV cache across fields, and decide all schema fields in one batched forward pass without writing JSON.
Jev Practices & Patterns#community#jevbest#catalog-import
16GitHub stars
Vendor-neutral harness that tests whether Jev reranking improves a small RAG stack, using frozen hybrid BM25 plus BGE-M3 candidates and isolating retrieval, rerank, and generation stages.
Jev Practices & Patterns#community#jevbest#catalog-import
7GitHub stars
Benchmark harness that tests whether models can forecast federal motion-to-dismiss outcomes from the written record, scored per claim-defendant pair with micro-Brier and clustered intervals.
Jev Practices & Patterns#community#jevbest#catalog-import
Frozen 100-question-per-cell check of TypeSafe Jev on Korean versus English reading, paraphrase, and medical exam items, with recorded responses and uncertainty intervals.
Jev Practices & Patterns#community#jevbest#catalog-import
8GitHub stars
Reproducible harness comparing Jev, Laya, two LLMs, and two BERT variants on SST-2, AG News, and Banking77 for accuracy, calibration, latency, throughput, and cost.
Jev Practices & Patterns#community#awesomejev#catalog-import
7GitHub stars
Python client and decision toolkit for the Jev System One endpoint with noul, choice, and score primitives, batched asks, composition helpers, concurrent evaluation, and an MCP server.
Jev Practices & Patterns#community#jevbest#catalog-import

From the Jev guides

Original write-ups on what this entry is for.

Most Jev accuracy problems are state problems. What belongs in a state, what is a pre-made judgment to leave out, and why naming the slice you ask about matters more than the wording.
Jev Practices & Patterns#state#design#primitives
Read article
A Noul returns one number and no separate confidence. How to read the value, pin its boundary with criteria, split compound questions, and set a per-action threshold that matches the cost of being wrong.
Jev Practices & Patterns#noul#primitives#confidence
Read article
A Score is a weighted position, not a ruler. Why the number can land between levels, why levels are judged separately, and how to combine several atomic scores in code instead of one crowded rubric.
Jev Practices & Patterns#score#primitives#scoring
Read article
Back to all resources

From the Jev community

Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.

Follow @typesafeai