CommunityJev Models & Reimplementations
JevGPT: Thinking Fast and Slow in Autonomous Research (arXiv 2610.18272)
A dual-system architecture for autonomous research that couples fast evidence processing with deliberative planning: System Two sets evidence objectives, System One locates support. On fixed-corpus QA and document ranking it reports leading performance with lower cost than comparable agents.
- Format
- Article
- Published by
- Community
- Last verified
- Oct 2026
Highlights
- Dual-system design: System Two sets evidence objectives and integrates findings while System One judges sources.
- Independent source judgments run in parallel, and selected original passages inform the next research step.
- System One locates support, assesses relevance, and guides further inspection during the research loop.
- Reports faster completion and lower cost than comparably effective research agents on fixed-corpus QA and document ranking.
- Evidence analysis shows broader source inspection and greater coverage of supporting documents.
Watch out
arXiv preprint submitted October 13, 2026 (cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.IR) by Yasheng Sun and 11 co-authors. The leading-performance claim is self-reported; the abstract names no baseline systems or absolute scores, and the comment lists a project page rather than a code repository.
Questions about this entry
Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.
System Two is the deliberative research planner that sets evidence objectives and integrates findings, while System One is the fast evidence processor that locates support, assesses relevance, and guides further inspection.
Fixed-corpus question answering and document ranking. The paper reports leading task performance on both with faster completion and lower cost than comparably effective research agents.
Independent source judgments run in parallel, and selected original passages inform the next research step, so fast local judgments feed their findings back into the research decisions that shape further inspection.
No GitHub repository is named. The arXiv comment lists a project page at sunyasheng.github.io/projects/JevGPT, and the abstract describes experiments but no released code or dataset.
It shows broader source inspection and greater coverage of supporting documents in the research loop, which the authors highlight as efficient evidence processing leading to more capable autonomous research.
Relevant sources can remain uninspected or unused within a limited budget, leaving a gap between retrieval coverage and the evidence that actually informs research.
The arXiv comment lists 24 pages, 6 figures, and 7 tables under the cs.CL, cs.AI, and cs.IR categories, and the paper is dated October 13, 2026.
More Jev resources like this
Shows that open instruction-tuned models already read decisions from answer-letter logits without training, and that LoRA fine-tuning with a decision head lifts them past Jev: Gemma 4 31B goes from 79.6 to 84.4 on the new 2,352-question OpenDecisions set and scores 81.5 on JevBench v1.7.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
A working RLCD implementation for reasoning models: the model samples a rationale, and a strictly proper scoring rule grades the answer distribution it commits to afterward. With Qwen3-1.7B it matches or beats SFT, RFT/STaR, and GRPO in accuracy and beats all in selective prediction.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
ZimmyGao/openjev-rlcdPython
ZimmyGao/openjev-rlcdPythonAn audit of request independence in seven open Jev-style checkpoints, using 276 three-passage states built from 92 TREC retrieval queries. Paired interventions show request expansion flips 9.1%/8.0% of Nimble's judgments and changes up to 21.4% of selection-or-abstention actions.
Jev Benchmarks & EvaluationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
SanSi turns a pre-trained looped language model into a typed decision model that revises its hidden state across loops without generating tokens. On 10,027 test decisions from 59 sources it reaches 72.0% accuracy, 13.5 points above a same-shaped non-looped model trained with the same recipe.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
StartLux-Decision is a family of decision models from 0.8B to 27B parameters pairing single-pass Instant variants with AutoThink versions that reason only when uncertain. On the public subset of Decision Index 0.3 the 27B AutoThink model reaches 73.4.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
423GitHub stars
PostHog's reasoning Jev-style classifier with a diffusion drafter, reporting higher accuracy than Kev-9B and hosted Jev on held-out and JevBench tiers.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#community#evaluation#open-models
Community
PostHog/jeevesPython
PostHog/jeevesPythonFrom the Jev guides
Original write-ups on what this entry is for.
Training recipes, looped architectures, and language ports: what the open side of the typed-decision class shipped this month, and how to pick by runtime and calibration instead of the leaderboard.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#open-models#training#local
Read article
Jev takes text only; Clef-omni adds image, audio, and video input and Liquid d1 adds images, each keeping the same typed-answer shape. Where that matters, where it does not, and the costs the vendors underplay.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#multimodal#open-models#decision-model
Read article
One model in September, a dozen by October. Clef, Liquid d1, Perplexity, and OpenAI all ship the same typed-answer shape now. How to read the rival benchmarks and pick on your own task.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#decision-model#benchmarks#pricing
Read article
From the Jev community
Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.