User repository on GitHub
GPT drives research. Jev finds evidence in parallel.
- Forks
- 1
- Last pushed
- Updated Sep 2026
Repo stats from the GitHub API, cached Oct 2026.
A research agent where GPT picks what to look for and Jev judges many document regions in one call, so the code can hand back verbatim passages for verification.
User repository on GitHub
GPT drives research. Jev finds evidence in parallel.
Repo stats from the GitHub API, cached Oct 2026.
GPT drives the research. Jev finds evidence in parallel. Paper on arXiv — coming soon. Quick start · Method · Results · Run BrowseComp-Plus · Docs. Jev Deep Research explores parallel evidence finding for research agents. GPT chooses what to investigate. Jev evaluates independent document regions concurrently, and code returns selected original passages for GPT to verify and use in the next research step. Our BrowseComp-Plus experiments pair Pi-Serini's BM25 search with Jev batches of 20, 40, or 60 documents.
Quoted from the project's README. Read the full README.
Watch out
The reported accuracy numbers are small development experiments on 20 questions with one attempt per question per variant, and the README says candidate width and Jev concurrency were changed together with no same-depth no-Jev batch control. That means the gains cannot be attributed to Jev rather than to the wider workflow changes. Costs use frozen token rates, exclude local compute and are not account bills, and missing usage is not imputed. The offline demo's answer and confidence come from a synthetic fixture and are not measurements of anything. The best row is a frozen experiment entry, and the arXiv paper is described as still forthcoming, so CITATION.cff is the current citation path. Running the benchmark itself needs Azure OpenAI with Entra auth, a Typesafe key and a corpus search service behind a Qwen3-Embedding-8B dense index. Copy reviewed against the repository README on 2026-10-04, not from running it.
Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.