Article
CommunityJev Models & Reimplementations
From Large Language Models to Efficient System One Models via Adaptive Computation
arXiv paper on adaptive computation for System One decision models. It reports that decision information concentrates in intermediate layers, that the final six layers can be removed without loss, and proposes jointly training a full model with prefix sub-models plus a lightweight exit gate.
- Format
- Article
- Reading time
- 2 min
- Published by
- Community
- Added
- Nov 2026
Highlights
- Finds decision information concentrated in intermediate layers of System One models.
- Reports the final six layers are removable without loss.
- Proposes jointly training a full model with prefix sub-models that share its final layers and decision head.
- A lightweight gate reads the hidden state at each exit to decide whether more computation is needed.
- Evaluated on seven decision benchmarks, matching or outperforming independently trained models at every depth.
Questions about this entry
Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.
Transferring an LLM into a System One decision model usually replaces the language modeling head with a decision head but keeps the full backbone, so every decision pays for all layers. The paper asks how much depth such decisions actually require and how to share computation across depths instead of only shrinking the backbone.
The authors find decision information is concentrated in intermediate layers: early layers build essential features, and the final six layers can be removed without loss. Independently trained smaller models largely mimic the full model rather than developing specialized decision capabilities.
It jointly trains a full model with prefix sub-models that share its final layers and decision head through self-distillation, so one model can operate at multiple layers.
A lightweight gate reads the hidden state at each exit and determines whether additional computation is needed, allowing a single model to run at multiple depths.
Across seven decision benchmarks, the approach matches or outperforms independently trained models at every depth while achieving better accuracy-efficiency trade-offs through adaptive computation.
The material provided does not state whether code or weights are released. It describes the method, the layer-depth findings, and the seven-benchmark evaluation, and is listed as an arXiv preprint.
It is a research method for depth efficiency in decision models, not a packaged runtime or hosted endpoint. Teams wanting a ready-made SDK, adapter, or service should look elsewhere, and the reported results come from seven decision benchmarks rather than production workloads.
Reactions & coverage
Posts, threads, and videos about this entry from around the web.
Hacker News: ASTGL replay chose local Laya routing over hosted Jev on one Mac Studio setup.
Jmeg8r15 pointsDoes an open-weight decision model beat a hosted one? Jev vs. LayaRead the thread on Hacker NewsReddit: A walkthrough of routing between models with Jev.
X: Standard One SH (StandardThinking)
Facebook: Intake Router keeps diagnosis out of the answer space at the front desk.
FacebookClinicnotes
From the Jev guides
Original write-ups on what this entry is for.
From the Jev AI model community
Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.