User repository on GitHub
- Forks
- 2
- Last pushed
- Updated Sep 2026
Repo stats from the GitHub API, cached Oct 2026.
CommunityJev Models & Reimplementations
Visual Jev: Accurate and Efficient Decisions from Shared Visual Context (arXiv 2609.25845)
Encodes an image and public context once, runs isolated question suffixes as a batch, and reads candidate probabilities from the backbone's language-model head. Answer-supervised post-training lifts equal-weight macro accuracy from 70.6% to 76.1% across four benchmarks.
- Stars
- 45
- Language
- Python
- License
- APACHE-2.0
- Format
- Article
- Published by
- Community
- Last verified
- Oct 2026
Highlights
- Targets the case of several independent, forced-choice questions asked about the same image.
- Answer-supervised post-training raises equal-weight macro accuracy from 70.6% to 76.1%.
- At 32 questions per image, shared batched execution is 8.9x faster in warm amortized time than independent serial execution.
- Remains 3.4x faster than an already-batched baseline that recomputes the prefix, at the cost of higher peak memory.
- A matched typed-head control offers no consistent accuracy advantage over the language-model-head readout.
Watch out
arXiv preprint submitted September 22, 2026 (cs.CV, cs.LG) by Guanxu Yu and Yuhang Yao. The accuracy gain is concentrated on the two task families represented in training, and speed comparisons use warm amortized timing while carrying higher peak memory; code is linked in the comment.
Questions about this entry
Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.
Vision applications that ask several independent forced-choice questions about the same image, where the image and public context can be encoded once and reused.
Across four benchmarks, answer-supervised post-training raises equal-weight macro accuracy from 70.6% to 76.1%, with the gain concentrated on the two task families represented in training.
At 32 questions per image, shared batched execution is 8.9x faster in warm amortized time than independent serial execution and 3.4x faster than an already-batched baseline that recomputes the prefix.
Higher peak memory; the timing advantage is measured as warm amortized time.
No. A matched typed-head control offers no consistent accuracy advantage over the language-model-head readout in the paper's comparison.
A simple one: adapt the backbone for quality, retain the existing readout, and share execution for efficiency.
The arXiv comment lists code at github.com/guanxuyu-sv/Visual-Jev.
Reactions & coverage
Posts, threads, and videos about this entry from around the web.
Hacker News: A one-token logprob wrapper that also classifies webcam frames.
allanrbo151 pointsA single function Jev-like wrapper for LLMs, including vision modelsRead the thread on Hacker NewsMore Jev resources like this
Presents PixelJev, a native-image decision interface that maps an image, a task instruction, and a runtime candidate set to a structured choice and candidate-conditioned probabilities. 64-shot source adaptation raises Pets accuracy from 60.13% to 92.40% across optimization seeds.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
Casts video understanding and interaction as structured decisions by replacing autoregressive answer decoding with a shared head that scores temporal intervals and textual options. VideoJev-4B and VideoJev-35B-A3B improve mean mIoU by 6.7 and 10.8 points on temporal grounding with 2.8–3.1x speedups.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
0GitHub stars
Trains a small decision head label-free to recover about 99% of a frozen language model's multiple-choice accuracy using two-thirds of its transformer layers. Its +1T variant reaches 75.0% mean accuracy across eight benchmarks versus 75.7% for the full model, with higher batched vLLM throughput.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
Ujjawal-K-Panchal/FunDMPython
Ujjawal-K-Panchal/FunDMPython17GitHub stars
Jev-compatible decision models with vision input: LoRA fine-tunes of Qwen3.5 at 4B and 9B serving Choice, Score and Noul on the /v1/systemone wire format, with screenshots and photos placed beside text in the state. Runs on your own NVIDIA GPU; weights are non-commercial.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#community#vision#open-weights
Community
Xiaooolong/vevPython
Xiaooolong/vevPythonSecJev is a family of security-specialized System One decision models from 0.8B to 9B parameters, built on Kev's single-pass candidate scorer. It spans 14 tasks and eight sources, and SecJev-0.8B beats general Kev-9B by 20.51 points in task-macro accuracy.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
Introduces Jeva, a decision-native architecture that encodes the request and each option separately and scores options symmetrically. It targets null-awareness, permutation invariance, option scalability, and cacheability, reporting near-perfect null detection and no decision flips under tested permutations.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
From the Jev guides
Original write-ups on what this entry is for.
Training recipes, looped architectures, and language ports: what the open side of the typed-decision class shipped this month, and how to pick by runtime and calibration instead of the leaderboard.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#open-models#training#local
Read article
Jev takes text only; Clef-omni adds image, audio, and video input and Liquid d1 adds images, each keeping the same typed-answer shape. Where that matters, where it does not, and the costs the vendors underplay.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#multimodal#open-models#decision-model
Read article
One model in September, a dozen by October. Clef, Liquid d1, Perplexity, and OpenAI all ship the same typed-answer shape now. How to read the rival benchmarks and pick on your own task.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#decision-model#benchmarks#pricing
Read article
From the Jev community
Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.