CommunityJev Models & Reimplementations
VideoJev: System One Model for Video Understanding and Interaction (arXiv 2610.18615)
Casts video understanding and interaction as structured decisions by replacing autoregressive answer decoding with a shared head that scores temporal intervals and textual options. VideoJev-4B and VideoJev-35B-A3B improve mean mIoU by 6.7 and 10.8 points on temporal grounding with 2.8–3.1x speedups.
- Format
- Article
- Published by
- Community
- Last verified
- Oct 2026
Highlights
- Replaces autoregressive answer decoding with a shared head that scores temporal intervals and textual options.
- Unifies temporal grounding and multiple-choice video question answering over video evidence.
- VideoJev-4B improves mean mIoU over its backbone by 6.7 points on three temporal grounding benchmarks.
- VideoJev-35B-A3B improves mean mIoU by 10.8 points, with measured inference speedups of 2.8–3.1x.
- On four video QA benchmarks both models match their backbones in Thinking mode with speedups exceeding 100x.
Watch out
arXiv preprint submitted October 13, 2026 (cs.CV) by Yuhan Zhu and 17 co-authors. Grounding and QA improvements are self-reported against the base MLLMs; the project page in the comment is not a GitHub repository, and the abstract names no released weights or datasets.
Questions about this entry
Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.
It replaces autoregressive answer decoding with a shared head that scores temporal intervals and textual options against video evidence, yielding event spans or answer choices rather than generated text.
Temporal grounding and multiple-choice video question answering, combining the semantic flexibility of MLLMs with decisions agents can use directly.
Across three grounding benchmarks, VideoJev-4B and VideoJev-35B-A3B improve mean mIoU over their backbones by 6.7 and 10.8 points, with measured inference speedups of 2.8–3.1x.
On four video QA benchmarks both achieve performance comparable to their backbones in Thinking mode, with measured inference speedups exceeding 100x.
Through Cached inference for queries as they arrive and Joint inference for multiple queries in a single forward pass, since new goals prompt further queries about the same visual history.
As an interaction unfolds, intermediate results and new goals prompt further queries about the same visual history, so recomputing the video for every query would be wasteful.
The comment lists a project page at mcg-nju.github.io/VideoJev, but the digest names no GitHub repository or released checkpoint.
Reactions & coverage
Posts, threads, and videos about this entry from around the web.
Hacker News: A one-token logprob wrapper that also classifies webcam frames.
allanrbo151 pointsA single function Jev-like wrapper for LLMs, including vision modelsRead the thread on Hacker NewsMore Jev resources like this
Presents PixelJev, a native-image decision interface that maps an image, a task instruction, and a runtime candidate set to a structured choice and candidate-conditioned probabilities. 64-shot source adaptation raises Pets accuracy from 60.13% to 92.40% across optimization seeds.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
45GitHub stars
Encodes an image and public context once, runs isolated question suffixes as a batch, and reads candidate probabilities from the backbone's language-model head. Answer-supervised post-training lifts equal-weight macro accuracy from 70.6% to 76.1% across four benchmarks.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
guanxuyu-sv/Visual-JevPython
guanxuyu-sv/Visual-JevPython17GitHub stars
Jev-compatible decision models with vision input: LoRA fine-tunes of Qwen3.5 at 4B and 9B serving Choice, Score and Noul on the /v1/systemone wire format, with screenshots and photos placed beside text in the state. Runs on your own NVIDIA GPU; weights are non-commercial.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#community#vision#open-weights
Community
Xiaooolong/vevPython
Xiaooolong/vevPythonSecJev is a family of security-specialized System One decision models from 0.8B to 9B parameters, built on Kev's single-pass candidate scorer. It spans 14 tasks and eight sources, and SecJev-0.8B beats general Kev-9B by 20.51 points in task-macro accuracy.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
Introduces Jeva, a decision-native architecture that encodes the request and each option separately and scores options symmetrically. It targets null-awareness, permutation invariance, option scalability, and cacheability, reporting near-perfect null detection and no decision flips under tested permutations.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
Shows that open instruction-tuned models already read decisions from answer-letter logits without training, and that LoRA fine-tuning with a decision head lifts them past Jev: Gemma 4 31B goes from 79.6 to 84.4 on the new 2,352-question OpenDecisions set and scores 81.5 on JevBench v1.7.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
From the Jev guides
Original write-ups on what this entry is for.
Training recipes, looped architectures, and language ports: what the open side of the typed-decision class shipped this month, and how to pick by runtime and calibration instead of the leaderboard.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#open-models#training#local
Read article
Jev takes text only; Clef-omni adds image, audio, and video input and Liquid d1 adds images, each keeping the same typed-answer shape. Where that matters, where it does not, and the costs the vendors underplay.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#multimodal#open-models#decision-model
Read article
One model in September, a dozen by October. Clef, Liquid d1, Perplexity, and OpenAI all ship the same typed-answer shape now. How to read the rival benchmarks and pick on your own task.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#decision-model#benchmarks#pricing
Read article
From the Jev community
Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.