Why can't existing crash databases answer this question?

No crash database records pregnancy; existing estimates come from national investigation samples with wide intervals, trauma registries that see only the injured, or record linkage in a few states.

How many narratives did the study read?

It read every police crash narrative in Texas from 2017 through 2025, 5,018,079 in total.

What screening and reading procedure did the pipeline use?

A regular-expression screen flagged 6,840 candidates, which Jev read under an eight-question schema returning probabilities and no text; the same model also read 499,306 of the remainder under the presence question.

How many pregnancies did Jev confirm and estimate?

Jev confirmed 5,333 as documenting a pregnant person involved in the crash, with role, stage, and post-crash condition; the Rogan-Gladen estimator with a bootstrap gives 5,467 crashes overall, with a 95% interval of 5,306 to 5,577.

What did human adjudication of the model's probabilities show?

Blind human adjudication of a probability-stratified sample gives weighted sensitivity 0.999 and specificity 1.000, which anchor the population estimate.

How much fetal harm was documented?

The estimate includes 58 crashes documenting fetal harm, according to the abstract.

How complete is this surveillance relative to expected pregnancies?

Measured against a live-birth expectation from vital statistics, narratives document 2.56% to 3.09% of expected pregnant drivers; documented-case status is most strongly associated with the driver's own recorded injury at an odds ratio of 21.7.

CommunityJev Tools & CLIs

Counting the Uncounted: Population-Level Surveillance of Documented Pregnancy and Fetal Harm in Police Crash Narratives with a System One Model (Jev) (arXiv 2610.00213)

A population-scale surveillance study in which Jev reads every Texas police crash narrative from 2017 through 2025, 5,018,079 in total, under an eight-question schema. It estimates 5,467 crashes with a documented pregnancy, including 58 documenting fetal harm.

See highlights

Open arxiv.org pozapas/pregnancy-crash-narratives

Stars: 0
Language: Python
License: MIT
Format: Article
Published by: Community
Last verified: Oct 2026

pozapas/pregnancy-crash-narratives

User repository on GitHub

View on GitHub

Extraction schema and pipeline for population-scale identification of pregnancy and documented fetal harm in police crash narratives. Code and schema only; no data.

Forks: 0
Last pushed: Updated Sep 2026

Repo stats from the GitHub API, cached Oct 2026.

Tagscommunity research arxiv road-safety extraction public-health

Works forJev for Extraction Jev for Classification Jev for Evaluation

Used inJev for Data & Analytics Jev for Healthcare & Life Sciences

Languages: Python

Highlights

Reads every Texas police crash narrative from 2017 through 2025, 5,018,079 in total.
A regular-expression screen flags 6,840 candidates; Jev confirms 5,333 as documenting a pregnant person.
The same model reads 499,306 of the remainder under the presence question to estimate missed cases.
Blind human adjudication gives weighted sensitivity 0.999 and specificity 1.000.
Person-level records give 1.13 to 1.45 per 1,000 female drivers aged 15 to 49.

Watch out

arXiv preprint posted September 21, 2026 (stat.AP) by Amir Rafe and Subasish Das. The 5,467-crash estimate depends on the Rogan-Gladen estimator and a probability-stratified review sample, and narratives document only 2.56% to 3.09% of expected pregnant drivers, so the estimate is a documented-case figure rather than full prevalence.

Questions about this entry

Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.

Reactions & coverage

Posts, threads, and videos about this entry from around the web.

X: A 26-sheet plan set in 2.9 seconds

X: Which exam questions come back

X: 900 images in 40 seconds

Related terms

Glossary definitions related to this entry.

More Jev resources like this

Estimating Uncoded Crash Factors with Tabular Foundation and System One Models: Kumo Tabular and Jev (arXiv 2610.10321)

A system that joins coded and narrative views of 5,601,890 Texas crashes from 2017 to 2025 into population estimates: Kumo Tabular reads coded records, Jev reads narrative samples, and human judgments recalibrate the probabilities. Phone use appears in 15,074 injury crashes in narratives versus 7,340 in coded fields.

Jev Tools & CLIsArticle#community#research#arxiv

Community

pozapas/kumo-jev-crash-recordsPython

KITE: Scaling Jev Population Experiments with Sparse Flagship Calibration (arXiv 2609.27535)

KITE queries a typed behavioral kernel once per unique state, then runs populations of any size from the table, reserving an expensive flagship model for sparse paired anchors. On Epstein experiments with 9,070 participants, anchors covering 1.7% of states cut effect error by 41%.

Jev Tools & CLIsArticle#community#research#arxiv

Community

HengyuLi-Ozaki-lab/kite_population_simulatorPython

GraphDecisionBench: Benchmarking System One Models on Graph Tasks (arXiv 2610.06354)

A model-independent benchmark for graph decision tasks, combining structural task profiles, matched graph-text input contrasts, and heuristic-proposal controls. It finds accurate adjacency recognition does not guarantee broader structural correctness.

Jev Benchmarks & EvaluationsArticle#community#research#arxiv

Community

VictorYXL/GraphDecisionBenchPython

Benchmarking candidate coverage and rejection policy transfer in typed decision models (arXiv 2610.03387)

A benchmark of rejection-policy transfer across Laya, Jev, and Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct at equal calibration budgets, covering artificial omission, natural retrieval misses, and public out-of-scope queries. Source calibration often fails to preserve the target operating point.

Jev Benchmarks & EvaluationsArticle#community#research#arxiv

Community

luckykevvv/Decision_Model_BenchmarkPython

Prune First, Decide Fast: Scalable Semantic Query Processing with JEVDB (arXiv 2610.02046)

A semantic database system that answers filters, joins, classification, and ranking with fast typed decision models and escalates uncertain cases to LLMs. JEVDB-Flash posts the lowest latency on all 21 SemBench queries, and Semantic Bloom Filters remove 87.4% of join candidates on Shelob.

Jev Tools & CLIsArticle#community#research#arxiv

Community

Calibrated Decisions at Scale: Converting Police Crash Narratives into Probabilistic Crash Variables with a System One Model (Jev) (arXiv 2609.24052)

A system that codes Texas crash narratives as gated, typed Jev decisions returning probabilities and no text: a screen covered 499,500 narratives and 195,857 were coded with a 27-question schema. The typed model attains F1 of 0.908 against human labels, and recalibration cuts calibration error 3.3-fold.

Jev Practices & PatternsArticle#community#research#arxiv

Community

From the Jev guides

Original write-ups on what this entry is for.

Jev on the Gateways: Vercel, Workers AI, and OpenRouter

Oct 12, 2026

The request shape barely changes across surfaces; the surrounding contract does. When to call the API directly and when a gateway, a Worker binding, or a router entry earns its extra hop.

Jev Tools & CLIs#gateway#vercel#cloudflare

Read article

Exporting Decision Models: GGUF, ONNX, and Device Runtimes

Oct 10, 2026

Taking a decision checkpoint out of Python: what the GGUF and browser WebGPU exports preserve, what they change, and the parity evidence the model cards publish.

Jev Tools & CLIs#open-models#local#onnx

Read article

Records at Rest: Documents, Inboxes, and Risk Queues

Sep 28, 2026

Jev labels a record that already exists. Code moves, flags, or holds it. How the document, mail, and transfer tools keep the action out of the model.

Jev Tools & CLIs#classification#email#security

Read article

Back to all resources

From the Jev community

Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.

Follow @typesafeai