User repository on GitHub
- Forks
- 10
- Last pushed
- Updated Sep 2026
Repo stats from the GitHub API, cached Oct 2026.
CommunityJev Tools & CLIs
JEV-Star: Fast, Low-Cost StarCraft II Control with Language-Model Planning (arXiv 2609.27331)
A StarCraft II controller combining fast JEV action selection with persistent GPT-6 planning that defeats the strongest non-cheating built-in AI, Lv7. The combined system wins four full games at Lv5-Lv7 at a mean estimated cost of USD 3.71 per game, with a median JEV response time of 0.422 s.
- Stars
- 50
- Language
- Python
- Format
- Article
- Published by
- Community
- Last verified
- Oct 2026
- Languages
- Python
Highlights
- Defeats the strongest non-cheating built-in AI, Lv7, in full StarCraft II games.
- Wins four full games at Lv5-Lv7, including two Lv7 victories with different seeds.
- Retains a median JEV response time of 0.422 seconds while GPT-6 handles planning.
- Mean estimated model cost is USD 3.71 per game: about USD 0.15 for JEV and USD 3.56 for GPT-6.
- Across 35 battle maps the combined system raises mean enemy elimination from 16.50% to 37.69% and wins from 3 to 7 out of 105.
Watch out
arXiv preprint posted September 23, 2026 (cs.GT) by Weiyu Ma, Liangbing Zhao, Yongcheng Zeng, and Jian Zhao. The comparison evaluates complete systems and, as the authors state, concurrent interface improvements mean planning's contribution is not isolated by a controlled ablation.
Questions about this entry
Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.
Fast JEV action selection with persistent GPT-6 planning, in a controller that defeats the strongest non-cheating built-in AI, Lv7.
Four full-game wins at Lv5-Lv7, including two Lv7 victories with different seeds.
A median JEV response time of 0.422 seconds is retained.
Mean estimated model cost is USD 3.71 per game: about USD 0.15 for JEV and USD 3.56 for GPT-6.
The standalone controller reaches a 20-minute limit against Lv2 without expanding. Across 35 battle maps with three episodes per map and controller, the combined system raises mean enemy elimination from 16.50% to 37.69% and wins from 3 to 7 out of 105.
No. The authors state the comparison evaluates complete systems and concurrent interface improvements mean planning's contribution is not isolated by a controlled ablation.
Code is available at https://github.com/sc2musa/Jev_Star.
More Jev resources like this
Jev-Mobile moves mobile GUI agents to low-frequency VLM planning and high-frequency lightweight execution: the VLM specifies local goals, the accessibility tree defines a structured action space, and Jev selects actions. On AndroidWorld it reaches 79% task success against 78% for SeeAct-V.
Jev Tools & CLIsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
Studies a fast learned actor in closed-loop Doom that hands control to a reasoning vision-language model only when a gate opens. On 900 held-out questions, deferring the least confident 30% of decisions gains +0.13 with doomLaya's option order, but no closed-loop variant reaches the exit.
Jev Practices & PatternsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
dexmac221/doomgemmaPython
dexmac221/doomgemmaPythonA study of whether Jev can serve inside reinforcement learning training rather than as a single-domain black box. Frozen Jev fills reference-policy, exploration-judge, and replay-rater roles, and training with it beats a standard RL learner across nine MiniGrid tasks and three Atari games.
Jev Practices & PatternsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
A diagnosis-guided repair agent whose CWE classification comes from Jev. Jev beats six open-weight models on every classification and ranking metric and runs at 6.27x lower median latency than GPT-5.6-Sol; with Jev diagnosing, repair lifts the detector-measured security pass rate from 63.5% to 70.7%.
Jev Tools & CLIsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
Jev-Mem is an agentic memory architecture that gives a System-One control plane charge of memory typing, query routing, retrieval budgets, graph traversal, candidate scoring, and adaptive stopping, invoking System Two only for complex reasoning and synthesis. On LoCoMo it scores 0.777.
Jev Tools & CLIsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
JevSpawn, a compositional policy, connects natural-language task specifications to finite probabilistic exploration: parallel action spawning pairs with feedback-driven branch selection, representation revision, and recovery from retained alternatives, with no training. It improves performance on eight benchmarks.
Jev Agents & MCPArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
From the Jev guides
Original write-ups on what this entry is for.
A game tick is a state plus a legal action list. How Clash Royale, Minecraft, and the earlier Mario, Pokémon, StarCraft, and drone loops ask Jev one step at a time.
Jev Demos & Experiments#gaming#agents#control
Read article
The request shape barely changes across surfaces; the surrounding contract does. When to call the API directly and when a gateway, a Worker binding, or a router entry earns its extra hop.
Jev Tools & CLIs#gateway#vercel#cloudflare
Read article
Taking a decision checkpoint out of Python: what the GGUF and browser WebGPU exports preserve, what they change, and the parity evidence the model cards publish.
Jev Tools & CLIs#open-models#local#onnx
Read article
From the Jev community
Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.