Article
CommunityJev Models & Reimplementations
AgriJev: Efficient Agricultural Candidate Scoring with Multi-Scale Adapted Models (arXiv 2610.19478)
A family of adapted Qwen3.5 models from 0.8B to 9B that scores agricultural candidates in one forward call: AgriJev-9B reaches 75.44% mean accuracy across 17 test views and narrows the gap to hosted Jev 1.13.0.
- Format
- Article
- Reading time
- 2 min
- Published by
- Community
- Last verified
- Oct 2026
Highlights
- Adapts Qwen3.5 at 0.8B, 2B, 4B, and 9B to one interface: agricultural text, a judgment question, and candidate definitions in, scores out.
- AgriJev-9B reaches 75.44% mean accuracy across 17 external test views, 5.89 points above the original generator and 3.79 above matched agricultural SFT models.
- It outperforms the original generator on 13 of 17 views and narrows the mean gap to hosted Jev 1.13.0.
- Median scoring latency on a fixed A100 workload is roughly half that of same-scale answer generation.
- Source-aware training records and frozen evaluations retain the original groups and annotation provenance.
Watch out
A single-author arXiv preprint posted October 14, 2026 (cs.CL) covering one domain. Gains are task-dependent with failures alongside them, the hosted-Jev comparison is directional with different prompts and sample sizes, and the abstract names no weights release.
Questions about this entry
Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.
A family of agricultural decision models adapted from Qwen3.5 at 0.8B, 2B, 4B, and 9B. Each shares one interface: it conditions on agricultural text, a judgment question, and candidate definitions, then returns scores and relative probabilities in a single forward call.
AgriJev-9B reaches 75.44% mean accuracy across 17 external test views, exceeding the original Qwen3.5 generator by 5.89 points and matched agricultural SFT models by 3.79 points, and it outperforms the original generator on 13 of the 17 views.
The paper reports that AgriJev narrows the mean gap to hosted Jev 1.13.0, without claiming to beat it. The comparison is directional: sample sizes and prompts differ between the adapted models and the hosted API.
On a fixed A100 workload the median scoring latency is about half that of same-scale answer generation, because a decision readout skips decoding and extraction steps that text answers require.
The authors build source-aware training records and frozen evaluations from existing agricultural resources, retaining the original groups and annotation provenance, so the 17 test views trace back to their sources.
It is one domain and one author's preprint: gains vary by task and some failures remain, the baseline comparisons use native answer generation, and the paper does not ship a public weights or code link in the abstract.
Teams scoring agricultural candidates at volume without calling a hosted API, and anyone studying how far small adapted models carry the System One contract, since the family spans 0.8B to 9B at local-friendly sizes.
Reactions & coverage
Posts, threads, and videos about this entry from around the web.
X: Standard One SH (StandardThinking)
LinkedIn: What multimodal decision models actually change, and what they do not.
LinkedInJevDirectory.org
Hacker News: Decision Index 0.2.1 scores open reproductions of Jev on a frozen suite.
jackbravo4 pointsDecision Index 0.2.1 – 70 open reproductions of TypeSafe Jev's Decision ModelRead the thread on Hacker NewsHacker News: Pointer to a DiffusionGemma plus vLLM tutorial for a Jev-shaped classifier.
1 pointHow to build a Jev-style classifier with DiffusionGemma and vLLMRead the thread on Hacker NewsMore Jev resources like this
Shows that open instruction-tuned models already read decisions from answer-letter logits without training, and that LoRA fine-tuning with a decision head lifts them past Jev: Gemma 4 31B goes from 79.6 to 84.4 on the new 2,352-question OpenDecisions set and scores 81.5 on JevBench v1.7.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
PostHog's reasoning Jev-style classifier with a diffusion drafter, reporting higher accuracy than Kev-9B and hosted Jev on held-out and JevBench tiers.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#community#evaluation#open-models
Community
PostHog/jeevesPython
PostHog/jeevesPython0GitHub stars
Trains a small decision head label-free to recover about 99% of a frozen language model's multiple-choice accuracy using two-thirds of its transformer layers. Its +1T variant reaches 75.0% mean accuracy across eight benchmarks versus 75.7% for the full model, with higher batched vLLM throughput.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
Ujjawal-K-Panchal/FunDMPython
Ujjawal-K-Panchal/FunDMPython1.4kGitHub stars
Reads a typed decision from one prefill of a pretrained instruction-tuned model by restricting the next-token distribution to option tokens, then corrects label and position bias with no gradient steps. Averaging over cyclic rotations lowers order-flip rates and raises accuracy on 11 of 11 models.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
nokia-applied-research/AnyJevPython
nokia-applied-research/AnyJevPythonSanSi turns a pre-trained looped language model into a typed decision model that revises its hidden state across loops without generating tokens. On 10,027 test decisions from 59 sources it reaches 72.0% accuracy, 13.5 points above a same-shaped non-looped model trained with the same recipe.
Jev Models & ReimplementationsArticle#community#research#arxiv
Community
A community re-upload on ModelScope of NanoJev, the 0.6B Qwen3-based parallel decision model: full probability distributions over 2-255 dynamic choices in one batched forward pass with zero output-token decoding, approval-gated and license-free.
Jev Models & Reimplementations#community#open-models#local
Community
From the Jev guides
Original write-ups on what this entry is for.
From the Jev AI model community
Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.