introducing Unclutter: a smart ad + slop blocker with Jev 🤓 it auto cleans up pages from slop elements: ⬖ ads ⬖ cookie banners ⬖ upsells ⬖ bs dialogs BYOK. open source + free, download below 👇
What is Jev and How to Use it?
Codevolution's walkthrough of state, questions, and answers, then a customer-message demo in the TypeSafe playground and the TypeScript SDK.
- Category
- Guides & Articles
- Format
- Video
- Published by
- Community
- Author
- Codevolution
- Added
- 2026-09-28
- Last verified
- 2026-09-28
Highlights
- Covers what Jev is, how it differs from other LLMs, and the published speed and pricing.
- Walks through state, questions, and answers, and the three types: Noul, Choice, and Score.
- The demo classifies customer messages, detects frustration, and scores how frustrated the message is.
- It starts in the TypeSafe playground, then repeats the same requests from the TypeScript SDK.
Watch out
Details are from the video description. Pricing and speed lines in the talk should be checked against current TypeSafe docs.
Reactions & coverage
Posts, threads, and videos about this entry from around the web.
YouTube: Codevolution covers Noul, Choice, and Score, then classifies customer messages from the TypeScript SDK.
More like this
From the community
Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.
Unclutter: an ad and slop blocker that runs on Jev
An open-source BS meter for debates and investor calls
🚨 Open Source Jev BS meter you can use this to analyze any debate / investor call / interview / sales pitch / podcast video fact check live , for example this dario interview cost 60 Jev calls / 111K tokens / $0.0047 github.com/ChetasLua/jevm…
🚨 I gave the Trump vs Kamala debate a live BS meter using Jev every sentence, both candidates, 5 yes/no questions each 1,191 Jev calls / 1.18M tokens / 415 ms median total cost : $0.0497 same questions for both, clips picked by one fixed rule, not a fact-check
A Jev-shaped model on Cerebras and Qwen
Built an alternative version of @typesafeai but on @cerebras with Qwen 3.8 27b. Similar quality, similar performance, but vastly different cost. TypeSafe was way cheaper, and did beat Qwen on performance. Closest we can get using LLMs I think. Source: github.com/iammrduncan/ty…
After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI? I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev • 20-200x faster • 40-400x
Jev benchmarked on two public safety corpora
1/ Benchmarked TypeSafe's Jev on two public safety corpora. It doesn't generate text, it returns calibrated probabilities you threshold in code. 96.5% on prompt injection, all 662 messages in deepset/prompt-injections. No tuning. 325ms p50.
After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI? I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev • 20-200x faster • 40-400x
An open 151M-parameter decision engine
TypeSafe AI came out of stealth with Jev, and access is behind a waitlist. I built an open source version Verdict (Open-jev) you can run right now in a browser tab: And its a real post trained model..(link in comments) It is a post trained 151M parameters model. ModernBERT-base Show more
After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI? I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev • 20-200x faster • 40-400x
Agent Handoff Gate: agents verify what they hand off
I built Agent Handoff Gate with typesafe Jev An experimental protocol for AI agents to verify worker evidence before handing results back to the lead. Less blind trust, fewer useless review loops. github.com/zsoXi/agent-ha…
