I've been using Jev by @typesafeai Here's the six things i've tried and am confident I'll still use Jev for 60 days from now. There's many more experiments, ideas, and things I think I will use it for. It's a big deal (more on why in next post). But I am only sharing things Show more
TypeSafe Provider
@ai-sdk/typesafe-ai adds an evaluation model to the Vercel AI SDK: one experimental_evaluate call sends a state with choice, score, and boolean questions and returns typed answers, probabilities, confidence, and usage.
- Category
- Tools & Integrations
- Published by
- Community
- Author
- —
- Added
- 2026-09-22
Highlights
- Install @ai-sdk/typesafe-ai, set TYPESAFE_AI_API_KEY, and evaluate with typeSafeAi.evaluationModel('jev-latest').
- Choice takes 1-255 options, Score 2-10 ordered levels, and the SDK's boolean maps to TypeSafe's Noul as P(true).
- Answers arrive rounded to two decimals; result.rounding reports the precision, so probability sums can miss exactly one.
- Confidence for Choice and Score sits under result.providerMetadata.typesafe.confidence[questionId], apart from probabilities.
- Failures raise APICallError; the SDK retries 429 and 529 up to maxRetries (default 2), with no provider-side retry loop.
Quickstart
import { typeSafeAi } from '@ai-sdk/typesafe-ai';
import { experimental_evaluate } from 'ai';
const result = await experimental_evaluate({
model: typeSafeAi.evaluationModel('jev-latest'),
state: { message: 'I was charged twice. Please refund the duplicate.' },
questions: {
department: {
type: 'choice',
instructions: 'Which team should handle this?',
criteria: { billing: ['Charges', 'Refunds'], technical: ['Bugs'], other: null },
},
},
});
console.log(result.answers.department.choice);Watch out
Only the experimental evaluation API is supported - language, embedding, and image model factories throw NoSuchModelError - and the page is Vercel's, not TypeSafe's.
More like this
From the community
Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.
Six uses that stuck after 60 days
Security decisions that fit Jev
This made me rethink where AI actually fits into security engineering. For purely engineering work, forget about ChatGPT or Claude. TypeSafe AI just released Jev, and I think it’s going to change how we build AI into security workflows. Instead of asking an LLM to “investigate Show more
we are officially out of stealth! join the frontier and get access to Jev on our website (link on profile)
A million judged questions
Ask Jev anything. Give it a try at askjev.ai It won't answer. It will judge. Let's see if we can get to 1 million questions. @typesafeai 🤝 @convex work great together. @hmartenjoyer @CompleteSkeptic @justKDeng @mikeysee
Inferring Jev's internals from 1,000 calls
Jevの内部アーキテクチャを推測している技術記事(Jev’s Architecture Unmasked)からメモ。 ・本記事はJevのAPIを約1万回の呼び出して、内部構造を推測したもの ・従来の言語モデルを用いた分類やルーティングでは、トークンを1文字ずつ逐次生成するために膨大な無駄な計算コストが発生していた。 Show more
The open System One roundup
Jev 发布没几天,开源社区已经开始疯狂复刻了🔥 最值得推荐的五个模型: 1、Laya 421M:原生决策模型,支持 Mac 2、Decider-2B:最像 Jev,基于 Qwen3.5 3、NanoJev 0.6B:专门的 Decision Head 4、Reflex:Qwen3.5 + Direct Logits 5、System-One 4B:专门做概率校准 Show more
Jev 刚发布没几天,开源社区就出现了同款🔥 Decider-2B模型,是基于 Qwen3.5-2B 做了特殊调整 它和 Jev 模型是一样的 只做选择 评分和判断 不是文本类的 LLM 模型 但两者还是有几个明显区别: 1、模型 Jev:闭源 System One Model Decider:Qwen3.5-2B,约 1.9B 参数,Apache 2.0 开源 2、价格
The launch post
After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI? I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev • 20-200x faster • 40-400x Show more

