Skip to content

Jev directory

Rev

A reverse-engineering attempt at Jev: three Qwen-based decision models with a LoRA tune plus pointer head that the README reports at 87.7-92.0% accuracy on a 975-question public benchmark, against 85.0% for hosted Jev.
Stars
8
Language
HTML
License
MIT
Reading time
3 min
Published by
Community
Author
robbalian
Last verified
Oct 2026

robbalian/rev

User repository on GitHub

View on GitHub

Reverse engineering Jev using open models

Forks
2
Last pushed
Updated Sep 2026

Repo stats from the GitHub API, cached Oct 2026.

Highlights

  • Reports 87.7%, 88.7% and 92.0% accuracy for the 4B, 9B and 27B versions against hosted Jev's 85.0% on the 975-question eval set.
  • Speed and cost are server-to-server on one B200 per model on Modal; the 4B and 9B also undercut Jev's $0.0366 per 1k.
  • The pointer head picks one of the offered options directly, so nothing is generated; training data is 19,792 public decisions from 18 datasets.
  • Training took 33, 63 and 150 minutes for the three models, about $30 total; the whole project cost $438 on Modal.
  • A Snake demo has the 27B averaging 187 moves per game against hosted Jev's 113, across 10 seeded games with a 1,000-move cap.

Watch out

Copy reviewed against the repo README on 2026-10-15; the pasted README was truncated inside the Snake section. Accuracy, speed and prices are the author's own measurements on Modal, and the eval set reuses validation splits of the training datasets, so no independent reproduction is cited.

Questions about this entry

Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.

From the Jev guides

Original write-ups on what this entry is for.

From the Jev AI model community

Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.

Follow @typesafeai