Skip to content

JevAlt Benchmark

English, Turkish and German decision-model test data with probability targets: 3,116 held-out rows across three languages, where Deem-4B scores 94.7% in English against Kev-4B's 84.7%.

Format
Docs
Published by
Community
Author
Mert Kaya
Last verified
Oct 2026

Highlights

  • 3,116 test rows: 1,277 English, 1,019 Turkish and 820 German, each with a situation, typed questions and probability targets.
  • Headline results: Deem-4B 94.7% vs Kev-4B 84.7% English, Karar-4B 96.8% vs 87.1% Turkish, Wähler-4B 92.0% vs 81.1% German.
  • Live testing on 4 October 2026 captured 390 requests including misses: Deem-4B 122/130, Karar-4B 113/130, Wähler-4B 122/130.
  • Rows carry per-record licence fields: written rows are Apache-2.0, converted records keep MASSIVE, Open-Jev, PAWS-X and typed-decisions terms.

Watch out

Dataset-level licence is 'other' because row terms differ. The card warns the benchmark is not an independent general ranking: test and training rows share a pipeline, each row's split field reads train and the file path is the real split, and 14 Turkish plus 11 German test states repeat in training through MASSIVE or PAWS-X with different questions.

Questions about this entry

Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.

Reactions & coverage

Posts, threads, and videos about this entry from around the web.

Facebook: Intake Router keeps diagnosis out of the answer space at the front desk.

FacebookClinicnotes

YouTube: Jev explained for routing and judging, with a comparison against LLMs.

Hacker News: Vercel on using Jev for defined decisions and GPT-6 Astra when the job also has to write or use tools.

flashbrew4 pointsTypeSafe AI Jev vs. GPT-6 AstraRead the thread on Hacker News

Hacker News: ASTGL replay chose local Laya routing over hosted Jev on one Mac Studio setup.

Jmeg8r15 pointsDoes an open-weight decision model beat a hosted one? Jev vs. LayaRead the thread on Hacker News

Related terms

Glossary definitions related to this entry.

More Jev resources like this

Arabic intent-routing benchmarks split across MSA, Emirati, Saudi and code-switched slices: 4,974 held-out queries over 60 routes plus a 20-question unseen-domain RAG test, CC BY 4.0.
Jev Benchmarks & EvaluationsDocs#community#benchmark#evaluation
Community
A benchmark of natural-language requests to edge services paired with typed intent contracts: 33 conditions of 300 test cases each, from a UTS study on Jev decision models for edge orchestration.
Jev Benchmarks & EvaluationsDocs#community#benchmark#evaluation
Community
9GitHub stars
A reproducible experimentation framework and report series for Jev: it runs shared tasks at scale across benchmarks, routing and numeric prediction, and publishes bilingual findings on where the model holds up and where it does not.
Jev Benchmarks & Evaluations#community#python#evals
326,619 typed decision records from the frozen community-hard-mix-v2-final mixture: a redistributable projection of the data behind Open-Jev 27B training, with 2,053 Wikispeedia rows omitted.
Jev Benchmarks & EvaluationsDocs#community#benchmark#evaluation
Community
1,601,157 training and 66,482 test decision questions for JevEmbed, covering choice, score and noul types across ten Parquet shards of at most 200,000 rows each.
Jev Benchmarks & EvaluationsDocs#community#benchmark#evaluation
Community
Harmful/benign classification and answer-choice robustness for five type-safe models: 83,183 source requests from XSTest, OR-Bench and HarmBench in original, reversed and order-only variants.
Jev Benchmarks & EvaluationsDocs#community#benchmark#evaluation
Community

From the Jev guides

Original write-ups on what this entry is for.

Confidence is not accuracy, and a single global threshold is rarely the right policy. A practical guide to per-action gates, measured thresholds, and the logs you will want later.
Jev Practices & Patterns#confidence#routing#evaluation
Read article
Back to all resources

From the Jev community

Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.

Follow @typesafeai