Article
CommunityJev Guides & Articles
Exa: Law://WhatsNext tests Jev on legal contract review
In Law://WhatsNext's return episode, guest Chris Bridges of AI-native law firm Tacit Legal demonstrates Jev returning structured contract answers in 0.3 seconds where a chat model took 9.6 seconds.
- Format
- Article
- Reading time
- 2 min
- Published by
- Community
- Author
- Alex and Tom
- Last verified
- Oct 2026
Highlights
- The Exa Library episode is Law://WhatsNext episode 1, published September 29, 2026, running 27 minutes with Chris Bridges as guest.
- Bridges is a partner and COO at Tacit Legal, an AI-native law firm, and the driving force behind its supervised AI contract review service Tilder.
- In a simulated run he says Jev responded in 0.3 seconds with all of the answers, while the chat-based model took 9.6 seconds.
- He describes Jev's output as very structured, down to whether confidentiality is capped and what the cap applies to.
- The episode notes call Jev the first of TypeSafe's System One models; Bridges says System One is a term TypeSafe invented.
Watch out
Copy reviewed against the Exa Library episode page on 2026-10-17. The speed comparison comes from a single simulated demo in a transcript excerpt, and the guest works for a law firm building supervised AI contract review, so he is not a neutral evaluator.
Questions about this entry
Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.
The first episode of the podcast's new season: hosts Alex and Tom bring back guest Chris Bridges to make sense of Jev, what it is, how to access it, and its potential implications for legal work.
A partner and COO at Tacit Legal, an AI-native law firm, and the driving force behind its supervised AI contract review service Tilder. He appears as a returning guest and describes himself as a massive cynic.
In the simulated contract run, Bridges says Jev responded in 0.3 seconds with all of the answers, while the chat-based model took 9.6 seconds and returned an unstructured block of text.
Structured contract points: whether confidentiality is capped (yes), and whether the cap is calculated on fees paid or payable versus a total (fees paid or payable), which the episode contrasts with prose output.
Bridges says it is a completely new term TypeSafe invented, rooting it in an economist's idea of two brains: a fast, instinctive system one and a slower, reasoning system two.
The show notes say it is a hype-free, informative conversation about Jev and its potential relevance to legal products and services, and the guest is described as a massive cynic.
The timing figure comes from one simulated demo rather than an independent benchmark, and the guest works for a firm building legal AI products, as the entry's caveats note.
Reactions & coverage
Posts, threads, and videos about this entry from around the web.
Hacker News: Simon Willison's overview of Noul, Choice, and Score, and where a decision model fits.
benwerd53 pointsJev introduces a new shape of LLMRead the thread on Hacker NewsHacker News: swyx posts the Latent Space interview with Diogo Almeida.
swyx4 pointsJev: System One Models for Prod, Not God – With Diogo Almeida, CEO, TypeSafe AIRead the thread on Hacker NewsX: Diogo Almeida in five minutes
X: LLMs vs. Jev, clearly explained
From the Jev guides
Original write-ups on what this entry is for.
From the Jev AI model community
Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.