Article
CommunityJev Guides & Articles
TypeSafe Jev: the First Decision-Only Model Class, Benchmarked and Priced
A release guide with eval tables, pricing, curl and Python examples, and fit boundaries for Jev's early access.
- Format
- Article
- Reading time
- 2 min
- Published by
- Community
- Author
- Developers Digest
- Last verified
- Sep 2026
Works forJev for Evaluation
Used inJev for Software & DevTools
Highlights
- Lists POST /v1/systemone with model jev-latest at $0.042 per million input tokens and free output.
- Eval table: Jev 76.0% at $0.0001 and 0.4 s against GPT-6 Sol 79.1% at $0.2152 and 34.3 s.
- Cites the parallel-questions cookbook at 12.2x cheaper and 10.0x faster than per-question calls.
- Notes the Choice cap of 255 options and that no OpenCode provider exists yet.
Watch out
Aggregates TypeSafe first-party sources and repeats the vendor's own caveat that its multipliers are the high end of real-world gains.
Questions about this entry
Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.
TypeSafe's own. The table comes from the vendor's published workflow evals, and the guide's caveats are explicit: the workflows were designed by TypeSafe's capabilities team, and the reference answers are averages from GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5.1, which biases toward OpenAI and Anthropic models. Useful as a shape, not as a neutral scoreboard.
Only with the vendor caveat attached. Those are best-row-per-model figures on the same in-house workflow set, and the guide repeats TypeSafe's own warning that its homepage multipliers of 193.6x faster and 444.6x cheaper are the higher end of real-world gains. Your tail latency on your own state size will look worse than 0.4s.
Pin it. The guide notes jev-latest currently resolves to jev-1.13.0 and recommends the versioned id in production, and the alias already moved once during early access. Also note the 12.2x cheaper and 10.0x faster parallel-questions figure is thirteen batched against the same thirteen sent singly, so it is Jev versus Jev, not Jev versus an LLM.
No text at all: the guide describes a decision-only model returning choices, scores and booleans, so any prose still needs a generative model. And Choice caps at 255 options, which rules out open-ended ranking; you would enumerate candidates yourself and compose the decision in code, as the primitives are meant to be.
100,000 tokens per second and 80 requests per second, with a warning that the limits are adjusting dynamically and can change without notice while TypeSafe adds capacity; exceeding either returns 429, which the official SDKs retry with backoff.
64k tokens per request, with 32k of that for the state plus the longest question; Cloudflare Workers AI and Vercel AI Gateway each list a 32,000-token context window for their hosted Jev.
No. Requests and responses are not used for training, zero data retention is available on enterprise terms, and Jev is not fine-tuned or LoRA-adapted on customer data; every account gets the same weights.
Reactions & coverage
Posts, threads, and videos about this entry from around the web.
X: New signups no longer get free credits.
YouTube: Gary Explains the catch: Jev understands natural language but answers with structured values and confidence.
YouTube: David Ondrej explains the architecture behind Jev and how to build a business on it.
From the Jev guides
Original write-ups on what this entry is for.
From the Jev AI model community
Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.