User repository on GitHub
GTM workflows with Jev: datasets, prompts, and benchmark results.
- Forks
- 3
- Last pushed
- Updated Oct 2026
Repo stats from the GitHub API, cached Oct 2026.
Jev directory
CommunityJev Benchmarks & Evaluations
Jev Playground — deepdave98
GTM workflow experiments with Jev from deepdave98: weekly datasets, prompts, and benchmark results that test Jev against Claude on lead triage and routing, deal risk, reply triage, MEDDPICC from call summaries, duplicate accounts, and closed-lost reactivation.
- Stars
- 31
- Language
- Python
- Reading time
- 2 min
- Published by
- Community
- Author
- deepdave98
- Last verified
- Oct 2026
This is one of several Jev listings for the same project. The canonical entry is Jev Playground (MoonBit).
Highlights
- Six weekly workflow folders: lead triage and routing, deal risk, reply triage, MEDDPICC from call summaries, account dedup, and deal reactivation.
- The repository also carries an mcp-server folder alongside the weekly GTM experiments.
- Description: GTM workflows with Jev, including datasets, prompts, and benchmark results, with each workflow tested against Claude.
- GitHub metadata: 31 stars, 3 forks, Python, created 2026-09-22, last pushed 2026-10-16, and an empty license field.
Watch out
README and GitHub metadata reviewed 2026-10-17; the captured README is only a title, one sentence, and a list of folders, so the benchmark results named in the description, the datasets, and the prompts themselves were not available. The repository lists no license, and the claimed Jev-versus-Claude results could not be inspected here.
Questions about this entry
Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.
A repository of GTM workflow experiments with Jev, tested against Claude, organized as six weekly exercises plus an MCP server folder. Each week pairs a sales task with a Jev-based approach.
Lead triage and routing, deal risk, reply triage, MEDDPICC from call summaries, duplicate accounts, and closed-lost deal reactivation, per the folder list in the README.
The repository description names benchmark results comparing Jev with Claude, but the captured README shows only the folder list, so no accuracy, latency, or cost numbers are visible in the digest.
Each weekly workflow is built around Jev for the decision step, and the description frames the repository as GTM workflows with Jev tested against Claude. The capture does not show prompts or API calls.
Yes. The README's last entry links an mcp-server folder, which suggests the workflows can also be exposed through MCP, though the capture gives no tool list or setup steps.
No pricing is documented. Running the workflows means calling Jev and Claude, so accounts and keys are implied, but the digest shows neither key setup nor cost figures.
deepdave98 maintains it. GitHub metadata in the digest shows 31 stars, 3 forks, Python, created 2026-09-22, last pushed 2026-10-16, and an empty license field, so reuse terms are unclear.
More Jev resources like this
A benchmarking studio and real-time simulator that pits Jev (remote TypeSafe System One), a local Laya model and the optimal blackjack Basic Strategy against each other on identical deterministic shoes. It scores every deviation turn by turn and runs headless batches of up to 100,000 rounds.
Jev Benchmarks & Evaluations#community#github#blackjack
Community
mrbanana55/decision_blackjackPython
mrbanana55/decision_blackjackPythonA timestamped benchmark and trading arena that replays resolved prediction markets: models commit to probabilities using only information available at the time, and realized P&L is the headline metric with Brier, log-loss and ECE as checks.
Jev Benchmarks & Evaluations#community#github#python
Community
ruyianry/JevGymPython
ruyianry/JevGymPythonThe code and data behind ProbabilityBench: text-based simulated worlds with exact class probabilities, so a decision model's reported probabilities can be compared directly with ground truth. An arXiv paper and a Hugging Face dataset accompany it.
Jev Benchmarks & Evaluations#community#github#benchmark
Community
ishida-lab/probabilitybenchPython
ishida-lab/probabilitybenchPythonA measured audit of 300 public pages for AI citability using nine Jev decisions per page, checked against an LLM judge: Jev agreed on 85.8% of 900 decisions and cost 158 times less per page, with latency measured for both.
Jev Benchmarks & Evaluations#community#catalog-import#logicrw
Community
stas4000/jev-geo-auditPython
stas4000/jev-geo-auditPythonA Python benchmark that evaluates LLMs' reasoning and instruction-following by making them play chess against a random player or the Komodo Dragon engine in multi-turn dialogs, separating chess skill from protocol durability.
Jev Benchmarks & Evaluations#community#catalog-import#madewithjev
Community
maxim-saplin/llm_chessPython
maxim-saplin/llm_chessPythonOne Python interface for evaluating what LLM apps and agents say and do. Its CascadeEvaluator asks a decision model first — Jev, OpenAI's Decisions API, or any model served at /v1/systemone — keeps confident answers, and sends only the rest to an LLM judge.
Jev Benchmarks & Evaluations#community#github#python
Community
grounded-ai/grounded_aiPython
grounded-ai/grounded_aiPythonFrom the Jev guides
Original write-ups on what this entry is for.
From the Jev AI model community
Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.