Jev directory
CommunityJev Models & Reimplementations
Decision-2.0-Kai-0.6B
The 0.6B model in vLLM Semantic Router's Decision 2.0 family: a 0.60B fine-tune of Qwen3-0.6B-Base with an 8,192-token context that returns probabilities for choice, yes/no and score questions from one forward pass.
- Reading time
- 2 min
- Published by
- Community
- Author
- vLLM Semantic Router
- Last verified
- Oct 2026
- Capabilities
- Open sourceSelf-hostedRuns locally
Highlights
- 0.60B parameters with an 8,192-token context, Apache-2.0, fine-tuned from Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-Base.
- Card reports JevArena 48.6, the top score of its size class among five models compared.
- 12.7 JevArena and 9.8 Decision Index ahead of Decision 1.0 Kai; human-labelled transfer 45.9.
- Median 4.9 ms per single-question request on a single GPU, all question types in one forward pass.
- Quickstart: transformers>=5.17, torch, safetensors, then AutoModel...system_one or a 'decision' pipeline.
Quickstart
python
import json
from transformers import AutoModel
model = AutoModel.from_pretrained("vllm-sr/Decision-2.0-Kai-0.6B", trust_remote_code=True)
result = model.system_one(
state="The order arrived damaged yesterday. The customer has a receipt and asks for a replacement today.",
questions={
"route": {"type": "choice", "instructions": "Which team should handle this request?",
"criteria": {"returns": "Refunds, replacements and damaged deliveries", "billing": "Payments, invoices and charges"}},
"receipt": {"type": "noul", "instructions": "Does the customer have a receipt?"}},
)
print(json.dumps(result["answers"], indent=2))Watch out
Card reviewed 2026-10-17; every score and the 4.9 ms median are self-reported, with competitor rows drawn from a public board snapshot dated 2026-09-28, and the card does not name the GPU or the request mix behind the timing.
Questions about this entry
Short answers drawn from the linked project or page.
The 0.6B model of Decision 2.0, vLLM Semantic Router's decision-model family, fine-tuned from Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-Base. It answers choice, yes/no and score questions about an input at once and returns a probability for every answer instead of text.
It takes typed questions about a state and returns probabilities in one forward pass without output tokens, matching the System One shape. The quickstart calls model.system_one(state=..., questions=...) and prints the answers dictionary.
JevArena 48.6, the top score of its size class among five models compared, plus human-labelled transfer 45.9 and Jev Decision Index 16.3, up 9.8 from Decision 1.0 Kai's 6.5. All are self-reported.
A median of 4.9 ms per single-question request on a single GPU, with every question of the request sharing one forward pass. The card gives no GPU model or batching detail behind the median.
0.60B parameters and an 8,192-token context; Apache-2.0, fine-tuned from Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-Base, carrying the zero-shot-classification pipeline tag.
Install transformers 5.17 or newer with torch and safetensors, then load it with AutoModel.from_pretrained(..., trust_remote_code=True) and call system_one; the card also shows a transformers pipeline('decision', ...) alternative.
The table lists GLiNER2.5-Decide at 42.5, Bosun v3.1 0.6B at 38.5, Decision 1.0 Kai at 35.9 and Decision 1.0 Lex at 31.0 JevArena; competitor rows are a public board snapshot dated 2026-09-28.
Reactions & coverage
Posts, threads, and videos about this entry from around the web.
Hacker News: ASTGL replay chose local Laya routing over hosted Jev on one Mac Studio setup.
Jmeg8r15 pointsDoes an open-weight decision model beat a hosted one? Jev vs. LayaRead the thread on Hacker NewsReddit: A walkthrough of routing between models with Jev.
X: Standard One SH (StandardThinking)
Facebook: Intake Router keeps diagnosis out of the answer space at the front desk.
FacebookClinicnotes
From the Jev guides
Original write-ups on what this entry is for.
From the Jev AI model community
Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.