Skip to content
JevDirectory.org
CommunityPractices & PatternsArticleVerified 2026-09-22

How Much Does a Technical SEO Audit Cost in 2026?

A 2026 technical SEO audit price survey plus a measured case where a Jev pipeline crawled and judged 1,204 pages, producing 4,816 typed judgments in under three minutes for under $1 in model cost.

Open boringtoolskit.com
Category
Practices & Patterns
Published by
Community
Author
—
Added
2026-09-22
Tagscommunityarticlepricingevaluation

Highlights

  • Agency audits run $650 to $14,000+, consultants $500 to $3,000 typical, and tool subscriptions $99 to $449 per month.
  • One run crawled and judged 1,204 pages as 4,816 individual judgments in under three minutes.
  • Weekly striking-distance triage of 12 Search Console queries cost $0.0048 per run.
  • The pipeline uses self-hosted LibreCrawl and jev-1.13.0 with bicameral fan-out and calibrated thresholds.
  • Jev is priced at $0.042 per million input tokens with free output tokens in the stated run cost.

Watch out

Published by the operator of the Jev pipeline it measures, and the comparison excludes agency accountability, strategy work, and stakeholder management.

More like this

An early-access test of TypeSafe's Jev: calibrated judgments for half a cent
An independent trial running Jev on 24 Norwegian resource-tax hearing responses with eleven typed questions each, then comparing agreement, calibration, latency and cost against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.
Practices & PatternsArticle#community#evaluation#calibration
Community
Testing TypeSafe Jev, Mistral and Gemini for local event validation
A use-case study comparing Jev, Mistral Small 4, and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite on rejecting unsuitable local-event listings, with individually tuned prompts, accuracy, response times, and costs.
Practices & PatternsArticle#community#article#benchmarks
Community
jeff
208GitHub stars
A self-hosted implementation of TypeSafe's Jev System One API powered by the 400M-parameter GLiFormer encoder: it serves choice, score, and noul and drops into the official typesafe-sdk via TYPESAFE_BASE_URL, but trails Jev on reasoning-heavy tasks.
Practices & Patterns#community#python#open-models
Communityjeff
Back to all resources

From the community

Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.

Follow @typesafeai

A really smart switch statement

Nathan Flurry 🔩
Nathan Flurry 🔩
Rivet
@NathanFlurry
·

hype-free explanation of jev: jev does not replace gpt / claude jev is just a *really* smart switch statement like if 2016 ml classifiers got 2026 levels of intelligence it's a new* type of tool that will make a lot of workloads insanely fast, cheap, and accurate * = and by Show more

Diogo Almeida
Diogo Almeida
TypeSafe AI
@CompleteSkeptic

After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI? I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev • 20-200x faster • 40-400x

Watch on X
Reply
Read 230 replies

When a designer gets Jev

Full Jev video tutorial

The case against Jev-scored compaction

Theo - t3.gg
Theo - t3.gg
@theo
·

This is a terrible compaction strategy that fundamentally doesn't understand how compaction and context management work. Seems like a lot of people are confused so let's break this down. 1. Compaction isn't a filter The role of compaction is to clean up history to keep the Show more

tamara
tamara
@tamarajtran

found the perfect use case for @typesafeai Jev: instant compaction in 2026, why is compaction still a summarization prompt? Jev can make it instant by scoring every tool call and dropping what’s irrelevant

Watch on X
Reply
Read 182 replies

Classifying rows in DuckDB

A playable 16-judgment demo