Skip to content
JevDirectory.org
Primitives

Primitive limits

The hard caps to design around: 255 Choice options, 2 to 10 Score levels, and a 64k context covering state plus questions.

Category
Primitives
Also known as
—
Related terms
5
Directory entries
3
Docs
docs.typesafe.ai
Added
2026-09-24

Definition

Choice accepts a maximum of 255 options; Score accepts at least two and at most ten levels; the context window is 64k tokens for state plus all questions, with 32k for state plus the single longest question. Choice and Score answers carry confidence, while Noul returns only the probability.

The limits shape common patterns: very large candidate sets get pre-filtered or searched in two passes, and Score levels are kept few and well separated because they are weak at numeric calibration.

Tagsprimitivesapilimits

From the directory

The raw HTTP contract behind every SDK: POST a state plus typed noul, choice, and score questions to /v1/systemone, and get one answer per question, with error codes and retry guidance.
Sites & GuidesDocs#official#docs#api
Official
The model card for jev-1.13.0: $42 per billion input tokens with free output, a 64k context, 250k tokens per second, and how to list the models your account can call.
Sites & GuidesDocs#official#docs#models
Official
Semantic search over GitHub's Terms of Service: one request ranks all 218 lines with a Choice while a Noul checks whether the document contains an answer at all, including when it should say no.
Cookbooks & DemosDocs#official#cookbook#search
Official

From the community

Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.

Follow @typesafeai

The X algorithm, rebuilt with Jev

Hard-coded rules moved to Jev

A chief of staff for bots

Hide posts on X in plain language

$10,000 in Jev’s hands

I gave Jev $10,000 and let it trade

Diogo Almeida
Diogo Almeida
TypeSafe AI
@CompleteSkeptic

After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI? I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev • 20-200x faster • 40-400x

Reply

Jev plays Slay the Spire 2

昨天出的 typesafe.ai Jev 模型 适合高频决策,那岂不又是适合打游戏? 之前用 GPT-6 Astra 代打杀戮尖塔2 能力强但速度慢。 我刚实测用 Jev 打,行动思考只需 0.7秒, 画面我都没看清它就操作完了。 这超人类游戏速度, 着实又让我震惊瘫坐了😅 语言很难描述这感觉,看视频⬇️

Diogo Almeida
Diogo Almeida
TypeSafe AI
@CompleteSkeptic

After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI? I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev • 20-200x faster • 40-400x

Reply