Skip to content
JevDirectory.org
PrimitivesDot-and-index path

Backtick path reference

Naming a state field inside instructions with backticked dot-and-index paths, such as `ticket.messages[0].text`.

Category
Primitives
Also known as
Dot-and-index path
Related terms
4
Directory entries
2
Docs
docs.typesafe.ai
Added
2026-09-24

Definition

When a question is about one part of a structured state, the docs recommend naming it in the instructions with a backticked path. The model then knows which part of the state to judge, and readers can see it too.

Explicit paths reduce ambiguity and indirection, which are two documented accuracy risks. The same convention is used to refer to data fields embedded in structured instructions.

Tagsprimitivesdesign

From the directory

The three TypeSafe question types, the typed answers they return, how to choose between them, and how to ask several in a single call.
Practices & PatternsDocs#official#primitives#choice
Official
Instructions, option descriptions, score levels, and noul criteria all accept JSON, so you can label question parts, pass schemas and taxonomies, and keep candidate paths alive.
Practices & PatternsDocs#official#primitives#architecture
Official

From the community

Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.

Follow @typesafeai

Full Jev video tutorial

The case against Jev-scored compaction

This is a terrible compaction strategy that fundamentally doesn't understand how compaction and context management work. Seems like a lot of people are confused so let's break this down. 1. Compaction isn't a filter The role of compaction is to clean up history to keep the Show more

tamara
tamara
@tamarajtran

found the perfect use case for @typesafeai Jev: instant compaction in 2026, why is compaction still a summarization prompt? Jev can make it instant by scoring every tool call and dropping what’s irrelevant

Reply

Classifying rows in DuckDB

A playable 16-judgment demo

AI multiple choice, not essay writing

Screening agent actions with Jev

Tested TypeSafe’s Jev (no-text, probability-only model) as an AI agent safety monitor. Checking each action first worked well caught most attacks with almost no false blocks, and much faster than Gemini.

Image
Image
Image
Diogo Almeida
Diogo Almeida
TypeSafe AI
@CompleteSkeptic

After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI? I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev • 20-200x faster • 40-400x

Reply